Objective: To evaluate disease-free survival of cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009).
Methods: A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted including patients from the Surgery in Cervical Cancer Comparing Different Surgical Aproaches in Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer (SUCCOR) database with FIGO 2009 IB1 cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. We used propensity score matching to minimize the potential allocation biases arising from the retrospective design. Patients who underwent conization but were similar for other measured characteristics were matched 1:1 to patients from the non-cone group using a caliper width ≤0.2 standard deviations of the logit odds of the estimated propensity score.
Results: We obtained a weighted cohort of 374 patients (187 patients with prior conization and 187 non-conization patients). We found a 65% reduction in the risk of relapse for patients who had cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.75, p=0.007) and a 75% reduction in the risk of death for the same sample (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.90, p=0.033). In addition, patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery without prior conization had a 5.63 times higher chance of relapse compared with those who had an open approach and previous conization (HR 5.63, 95% CI 1.64 to 19.3, p=0.006). Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery with prior conization and those who underwent open surgery without prior conization showed no differences in relapse rates compared with those who underwent open surgery with prior cone biopsy (reference) (HR 1.94, 95% CI 0.49 to 7.76, p=0.349 and HR 2.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 10.86, p=0.106 respectively).
Conclusions: In this retrospective study, patients undergoing cervical conization before radical hysterectomy had a significantly lower risk of relapse and death.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2021-002544 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Fertility Sparing in Endometrial Cancer: Where Are We Now?
Cancers (Basel)
January 2025
Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecological Clinic, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological neoplasm with an increased incidence in the premenopausal population in recent decades. This raises the problem of managing endometrial cancer in fertile women who have not yet achieved pregnancy. In these women, after careful selection, hysterectomy may be postponed in favor of conservative management if specific requirements are met.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImpact of the Number of Positive Pelvic Lymph Nodes on Risk of Para-Aortic Recurrence in Patients with Clinically Early Cervical Cancer Treated by a Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy.
Cancers (Basel)
December 2024
Department of Gynecological Oncology, Centre for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam (C.G.O.A.), Amsterdam University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background: Guidelines recommend the extension of the pelvic radiotherapy volume to the para-aortic region in locally advanced cervical cancer and ≥3 suspicious pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) on imaging. Whether this recommendation is also valid for clinically early stages is uncertain. The objective of this study was to investigate the para-aortic (PAO) lymph node recurrence rate in patients with early-stage cervical cancer, ≥3 metastatic PLN, and negative common iliac nodes after a radical hysterectomy followed by pelvic (chemo)radiotherapy without extension to the PAO region.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFChallenging and continuing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for more than 30 Years at a single institution. After the LACC trial, should minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer really be discarded?
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Objective: The laparoscopic approach to cervical cancer (LACC) trial highlighted the necessity of an open approach for radical hysterectomy due to its negative impact on oncological outcomes. While minimally invasive surgery is an option for other organ cancers, its application in cervical cancer remains a challenge for surgeons. In this study, we aimed to assess the oncological outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy performed by experienced oncologic endoscopists in gynecology at a single institution.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBulgarian Experience in Vaginal Electronic Brachytherapy for Gynecologic Cancers' Treatment-First Results.
J Clin Med
December 2024
Scientific and Innovative Program Med for Health, Medical University Pleven, 1, Saint Kliment Ohridski Street, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.
: The objective of this study is to prospectively collect dosimetric and clinical data on vaginal cuff electronic brachytherapy and propose a protocol for the procedure. Twenty-five patients who had proven endometrial or cervical carcinoma and had undergone radical hysterectomy have been treated with vaginal cuff electronic brachytherapy. Treatment session durations and doses to the targets and the organs at risk have been extracted from the treatment planning software.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFShort-term efficacy of laparoscopic type C radical hysterectomy by deep uterine vein approach for treatment of cervical cancer.
Afr J Reprod Health
December 2024
Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Huai'an No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu 223300, China.
This was an original research. The objective of the study was to investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic type C radical hysterectomy by deep uterine vein approach in treating cervical cancer. Two hundred cases of cervical cancer were allocated into control group and intervention group.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!