Purpose: To identify how the Weiss ring affects the measurement of mean and sectoral peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thicknesses.

Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Methods: Subjects were divided into two groups: controls (control group) and subjects in which a Weiss ring was visible on optical coherence tomography fundus images (WR group). Mean and sectoral pRNFL thicknesses were compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 205 eyes were enrolled: 131 eyes in the control group and 74 eyes in the WR group. The mean pRNFL thicknesses of the control group and WR group were 97.2 ± 6.7 µm and 94.6 ± 10.8 µm, respectively (P = .042). In sectoral thickness, the inferior sector of the WR group was 112.1 ± 23.2 µm, which was significantly thinner than that of the control group (125.5 ± 13.3 µm; P < .001). The Weiss ring was located in 10 eyes (13.5%) in the superior sector, 7 eyes (9.5%) in the temporal sector, 40 eyes (54.1%) in the inferior sector, and 17 eyes (23.0%) in the nasal sector. In analyses of reproducibility, the coefficient of variation and intraclass coefficient of the inferior sector measurement were 10.90% and 0.409, respectively, indicating low reliability of the measurement.

Conclusions: Eyes with a Weiss ring showed thinner mean and inferior pRNFL thicknesses than normal controls, which would be a measurement error caused by the Weiss ring. This could be a major confounding factor for analyses of pRNFL changes, especially in glaucoma patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2022.01.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

weiss ring
28
control group
16
prnfl thicknesses
12
inferior sector
12
sector eyes
12
ring major
8
major confounding
8
confounding factor
8
peripapillary retinal
8
retinal nerve
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!