Objective: To compare levels of postoperative oxycodone use and incisional pain between two randomized groups-an intervention and a control.

Design: Mixed-methods design; quantitative data achieved via a randomized controlled trial, with qualitative data collected on binder use. The primary variable was oxycodone (in milligrams) required during the first 48 hours after birth, and the secondary variable was incisional pain levels measured on Postoperative Days 1 and 2.

Setting: Acute-care community hospital in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and an acute care urban hospital in Denver, Colorado.

Participants: A total of 220 individuals in the postpartum period after having cesarean birth.

Interventions/measurements: Participants were randomized to the intervention group (binder) or the control group (no binder). Data were collected on opioid usage for the first 48 hours. Participants in both groups were asked to rate their incisional pain on Postoperative Day 1 (24 hours after birth) and Postoperative Day 2 (48 hours after birth). Participants in the binder group were also asked to provide feedback on their experience wearing the binder.

Results: A total of 196 participants completed the study. The overall amount of oxycodone taken by individuals in the binder group was lower than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = .10). Pain scores in the binder group were significantly lower on Day 2 compared with the control group (p = .002). The majority of individuals in the binder group provided positive feedback about their experience wearing the binder.

Conclusion: Individuals routinely receive medications to assist with pain management postoperatively. Because of growing concerns related to the nation's opioid addiction crisis, there is interest in using multimodal treatments to achieve adequate pain control for individuals postoperatively. Abdominal binders are a low-cost intervention to assist with pain management and, given the results of this study, seem like a reasonable option to consider.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2021.12.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

binder group
16
incisional pain
12
hours birth
12
control group
12
abdominal binders
8
pain
8
data collected
8
group
8
group binder
8
postoperative day
8

Similar Publications

In a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis of 688,808 individuals with major depression (MD) and 4,364,225 controls from 29 countries across diverse and admixed ancestries, we identify 697 associations at 635 loci, 293 of which are novel. Using fine-mapping and functional tools, we find 308 high-confidence gene associations and enrichment of postsynaptic density and receptor clustering. A neural cell-type enrichment analysis utilizing single-cell data implicates excitatory, inhibitory, and medium spiny neurons and the involvement of amygdala neurons in both mouse and human single-cell analyses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tetrazole Is a Novel Zinc Binder Chemotype for Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibition.

ACS Med Chem Lett

January 2025

NEUROFARBA Department, Section of Pharmaceutical Science, University of Florence, Via Ugo Schiff 6, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.

The tetrazole group is here proposed as a zinc-binding warhead for the inhibition of the metalloenzyme carbonic anhydrases. A set of synthesized derivatives incorporating the tetrazole moiety were evaluated as inhibitors against a panel of human isoforms, exhibiting values spanning between the submicromolar and low-to-medium micromolar ranges (0.62-19.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The integration of real-world evidence (RWE) from real-world data (RWD) in clinical research is crucial for bridging the gap between clinical trial results and real-world outcomes. Analyzing routinely collected data to generate clinical evidence faces methodological concerns like confounding and bias, similar to prospectively documented observational studies. This study focuses on additional limitations frequently reported in the literature, providing an overview of the challenges and biases inherent to analyzing routine clinical care data, including health claims data (hereafter: routine data).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Identifying genetic differences between bipolar disorder and major depression through multiple genome-wide association analyses.

Br J Psychiatry

January 2025

Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, USA; Department of Human Genetics, University of California Los Angeles, USA; and Department of Computational Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, USA.

Background: Accurate diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BPD) is difficult in clinical practice, with an average delay between symptom onset and diagnosis of about 7 years. A depressive episode often precedes the first manic episode, making it difficult to distinguish BPD from unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD).

Aims: We use genome-wide association analyses (GWAS) to identify differential genetic factors and to develop predictors based on polygenic risk scores (PRS) that may aid early differential diagnosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!