Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To assess bone volume stability and identify critical bone graft thickness for guided bone regeneration (GBR) simultaneous to implant placement in the maxillary anterior region.
Methods: Eighteen patients were included in the study and received placement of one maxillary anterior implant combined with GBR using deproteinised bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and resorbable collagen membrane. The multilevel buccal bone thickness (BT) was measured by CBCT 1 to 2 weeks and 5 to 8 months post-implantation (at implant uncovering surgery).
Results: Significant buccal alveolar crest collapse (ACCb 1.20 to 1.70 mm) occurred during the mean healing period of 5.3 months (P = 0.000). A greater percentage of ACCb occurred at the coronal aspect of the implant, with 59.24% ± 19.22% at the implant platform and 34.10% ± 30.50% 6.0 mm below the implant platform, respectively. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that if BT was 1.8 to 2.0 mm at the implant platform at uncovering surgery, then it was estimated to have been 4.1 to 4.5 mm immediately post-implantation.
Conclusion: ACCb after maxillary anterior implant placement with simultaneous GBR occurred more coronally than apically. Excessive alveolar ridge augmentation, up to 4.0 mm of hard tissue buccal to the implant platform, should be achieved at the time of surgery to compensate for this potential resorption.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.b2440825 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!