A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

C-REGS 2 - Design and methodology of a high-quality comparative effectiveness observational trial. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to document Cerebrolysin treatment and related medications in patients with significant neurological deficits after ischemic stroke to evaluate their effects on rehabilitation outcomes at two time points (day 21 and day 90).
  • An open observational design based on high-quality comparative effectiveness research (HQCER) is employed to reflect real-world clinical practices and enhance result validity.
  • The study emphasizes the benefits of real-world studies, which can include larger participant numbers and greater statistical reliability compared to traditional study designs.

Article Abstract

The main aim of this study is to systematically record Cerebrolysin treatment modalities and concomitant medication, according to local standards, in patients with moderate to severe neurological deficits after acute ischemic stroke and to assess the impact of these parameters on therapy outcome during early rehabilitation (day 21) and on day 90. An open observational treatment design based on the principles of high-quality comparative effectiveness research (HQCER) has been chosen to capture the therapies as applied in real-world clinical practice. HQCER opens a new horizon for strengthening the validity of the results from observational trials, thereby enhancing the associated level of evidence. Rigorous pre-specification of analytical procedures and tight risk-based centralized monitoring were additional measures to improve the impact of the observational approach. The value for real-world studies has become obvious, and such studies based on comparative effectiveness designs supplement the classical study designs by enabling the inclusion of larger proband numbers and more statistical reliability for practical use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742899PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.25122/jml-2021-0362DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

comparative effectiveness
12
high-quality comparative
8
c-regs design
4
design methodology
4
methodology high-quality
4
observational
4
effectiveness observational
4
observational trial
4
trial main
4
main aim
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!