A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A systematic structural comparison of all solved small proteins deposited in PDB. The effect of disulfide bonds in protein fold. | LitMetric

A systematic structural comparison of all solved small proteins deposited in PDB. The effect of disulfide bonds in protein fold.

Comput Struct Biotechnol J

Programa de Biologia Estrutural, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo de Meis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-902, Brazil.

Published: November 2021

Defensins are small proteins, usually ranging from 3 to 6 kDa, amphipathic, disulfide-rich, and with a small or even absent hydrophobic core. Since a hydrophobic core is generally found in globular proteins that fold in an aqueous solvent, the peculiar fold of defensins can challenge tertiary protein structure predictors. We performed a Protein Data Bank survey of small proteins (3-6 kDa) to understand the similarities of defensins with other small disulfide-rich proteins. We found no differences when we compared defensins with non-defensins regarding the proportion of apolar, polar and charged residues and their exposure to the solvent. Then we divided all small proteins (3-6 kDa) in the Protein Data Bank into two groups, one group with at least one disulfide bond (bonded, defensins included) and another group without any disulfide bond (unbonded). The group of bonded proteins contained apolar residues more exposed to the solvent than the unbonded group. The algorithm for tertiary protein structure prediction Robetta was more accurate at predicting unbonded than bonded proteins. On the other hand, the trRosetta algorithm, which uses artificial intelligence, improved the prediction of most bonded proteins, while for the unbonded group no improvement was obtained. Our work highlights one more layer of complexity for the prediction of protein tertiary structure: The ability of small disulfide-rich proteins to fold even with a poorly hydrophobic core.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712280PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.11.015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

small proteins
16
hydrophobic core
12
unbonded group
12
bonded proteins
12
proteins
10
fold defensins
8
defensins small
8
proteins fold
8
tertiary protein
8
protein structure
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!