Introduction: US FDA issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking to reduce nicotine in cigarettes. To maximize the benefits of this potential standard, very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes must be communicated in a way that does not result in misperceptions.

Aims And Methods: Adults (n = 567 who smoke; n = 610 non-smokers) from an online platform were randomized to a control message previously associated with accurate addictiveness perceptions of VLNC cigarettes but health misperceptions or to one of five messages that also included messaging on nicotine morbidity effects or VLNC cigarettes morbidity or mortality effects. p value <.01 was significant.

Results: In participants who smoke, perceived lung cancer risk (responses: 1, very little risk to 10, very high risk) if smoked VLNC cigarettes regularly was higher in conditions that communicated mortality effects of VLNC cigarettes compared to the control (7.12-7.18 vs. 5.97, p values < .01). In non-smokers, perceived lung cancer risk was higher in all five message conditions when compared with the control (7.58-8.22 vs. 6.35, p values < .01). Proportion who responded accurately (ie, False) to the statement Cigarettes with 95% less nicotine are safer than cigarettes with normal nicotine levels was higher in conditions describing VLNC morbidity or mortality effects when compared with the control in both participants who smoke (52.04-67.37% vs. 30.85%, p values < .01) and do not smoke (62.50-72.38% vs. 32.00%, p values < .01).

Conclusions: Messaging on mortality effects of VLNC cigarettes (ie, cigarettes with 95% less nicotine are as deadly as current cigarettes) was associated with more accurate perceptions of the health risks of VLNC cigarettes than the control; however, misperceptions remained in one-third of participants.

Implications: One approach to communicating a VLNC cigarette standard to the public is to include messaging on the mortality effects of VLNC cigarettes. However, further study and possible refinement of this message condition are recommended since approximately one-third of participants exposed to this message still perceived VLNC cigarettes to be safer than normal nicotine content cigarettes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048884PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vlnc cigarettes
12
low nicotine
8
nicotine content
8
cigarettes
5
educating public
4
public health
4
health risks
4
risks low
4
nicotine
4
content cigarettes
4

Similar Publications

Public Perceptions of Very Low Nicotine Content on Twitter: Observational Study.

JMIR Form Res

December 2024

Department of Clinical and Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.

Background: Nicotine is a highly addictive agent in tobacco products. On June 21, 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a plan to propose a rule to establish a maximum nicotine level in cigarettes and other combusted tobacco products.

Objective: This study aimed to understand public perception and discussion of very low nicotine content (VLNC) on Twitter (rebranded as X in July 2023).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized the sale and marketing of two very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNC) as modified risk tobacco products.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Reducing the nicotine content in cigarettes decreases their addictiveness and abuse liability, including among adolescents. Whether these effects differ by race/ethnicity is unknown. This study is a secondary analysis of previously published data collected between 2014-2017.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study explores how restricting e-cigarette flavors to discourage youth use may impact adult smoking reduction, particularly among those with psychiatric issues or lower educational backgrounds.* ! -
  • Researchers conducted three randomized trials over 16 weeks with participants from at-risk groups, testing varying combinations of nicotine content in traditional cigarettes and the flavor options in e-cigarettes.* ! -
  • Key measurements included the number of cigarettes smoked daily and levels of tobacco-related biomarkers, which were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of different smoking cessation strategies.* !
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Racial Differences in Nicotine Reduction: Pooled Results from Two Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials.

J Racial Ethn Health Disparities

September 2024

Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the impact of switching from high nicotine cigarettes to very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes among Black and White smokers with lower socioeconomic status and mental health issues.
  • Data from two clinical trials showed that both groups experienced significant reductions in nicotine levels and toxic exposure when using VLNC cigarettes compared to usual nicotine content (UNC) cigarettes.
  • The results indicate that reduced nicotine regulation could lead to a notable decrease in nicotine and harmful substances for smokers, regardless of race, although differences in cotinine levels were noted between the groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!