Purpose: To determine if bedside rounds, compared with other forms of hospital ward rounds, improve learning outcomes in medical education.
Method: For this systematic review, the authors searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from inception through February 20, 2020. Experimental studies were included if they (1) compared bedside rounds to any other form of rounds in a hospital-based setting, and (2) reported a quantitative comparison of a learning outcome (e.g., learner reaction, knowledge, skills, behavior, health care delivery) among physicians-in-training (medical students, residents, fellows). Extraction elements were summarized using descriptive statistics and a narrative synthesis of design, implementation, and outcomes.
Results: Twenty studies met inclusion criteria, including 7 randomized trials. All studies involved resident physicians, and 11 also involved medical students. The design and implementation of bedside rounds varied widely, with most studies (n = 13) involving cointerventions (e.g., staff education, real-time order entry).Of the 15 studies that reported learner satisfaction, 7 favored bedside rounds, 4 favored the control, and 4 were equivocal. Of the 4 studies reporting an outcome of learners' knowledge and skills, 2 favored bedside rounds and 2 were equivocal. Of the 8 studies that reported on learner behavior (e.g., bedside communication with patients), 5 favored bedside rounds, 1 favored the control, and 2 were equivocal. Finally, of the 14 studies that reported a health care delivery outcome (e.g., teamwork, rounding time), 8 favored bedside rounds and 6 were equivocal. Due to the high risk of bias and unexplained heterogeneity across studies, the overall strength of evidence was low.
Conclusions: In hospital-based settings, learners' satisfaction with bedside rounds is mixed. However, bedside rounds appear to have a positive effect on learner behavior and health care delivery. Given their potential value, additional research is needed to identify barriers to and facilitators of educationally successful bedside rounds.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9126262 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004586 | DOI Listing |
J Adv Nurs
January 2025
Nursing Practice Development Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Aim: To develop a nurse-initiated protocol for early ward-based interprofessional coordination and formulation of person-centred care plans to assist in point-of-care management of behaviour in older patients on general hospital wards.
Design: A modified e-Delphi method was employed to establish expert consensus.
Method: Multidisciplinary acute-care experts experienced in hospital care of patients with dementia and/or delirium in Australia were recruited by email from 35 professional networks.
Qual Manag Health Care
December 2024
Author Affiliations: Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Xie); Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (Dr Xie) and Neurology (Drs Bahouth, Salas, and Zink), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Nursing, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Drs Barany, Watson, Zink, and Hairston and Ms Shakes); Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing (Drs Tanner, Hanson, Hansen, McDonald, and Hairston), Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (Dr Abu-Rish Blakeney).
Background And Objectives: Daily rounds provide an opportunity for interprofessional collaboration and patient/family engagement, which are critical to stroke care. As part of a quality improvement program, we conducted a baseline assessment to examine interprofessional collaboration and patient/family engagement during the current rounding process in a 12-bed comprehensive stroke center. Findings from the baseline assessment will be used to inform the development, implementation, and evaluation of a new rounding model.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPOCUS J
November 2024
Department of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences Dhulikhel NPL.
Emergency Medicine Point of Care Ultrasound (EM-POCUS) is a diagnostic bedside tool for quick and accurate clinical decision-making. Comprehensive training in POCUS is a mandatory part of EM training in developed countries. In Nepal, we need to build an educational curriculum based on the local medical system, available resources, and educational environment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Health Care Qual Assur
December 2024
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Purpose: Family-centered rounds (FCR) are a multidisciplinary process in which patients and/or family members are present and actively participate in medical rounds. While research has shown that FCR may enhance collaborative information exchange and reduce family anxiety, the impact of the information exchange modality on the experience has been largely unexplored. Medical rounds are typically assumed to be carried out in person at the bedside.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRev Bras Enferm
November 2024
Centro Universitário Newton Paiva. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Objective: To analyze the configuration of power relations among the multiprofessional team in the bedside round process in the hospital.
Methods: Qualitative research with data analyzed through discourse analysis, based on Michel Foucault's theoretical framework. From September to December 2022, we conducted interviews and field observations with the multiprofessional team at a hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, as well as qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 37 professionals.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!