AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study analyzed the effectiveness of machine learning-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in diagnosing coronary artery disease in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients by comparing it with non-DM patients across 484 individuals from various medical centers in China.
  • - The results indicated that FFR exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in both DM (79% sensitivity, 96% specificity) and non-DM (82% sensitivity, 93% specificity) groups, showing no significant differences between them.
  • - The findings conclude that diabetes did not adversely affect the accuracy of FFR, emphasizing its superiority over CCTA alone for detecting ischemia and noting that coronary calcification did not impact FFR's diagnostic

Article Abstract

Objectives: To examine the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning-based coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients.

Methods: In total, 484 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease from 11 Chinese medical centers were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent CCTA, FFR and invasive FFR. The patients were further grouped into mild (25~49 %), moderate (50~69 %), and severe (≥ 70 %) according to CCTA stenosis degree and Agatston score < 400 and Agatston score ≥ 400 groups according to coronary artery calcium severity. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match DM (n  = 112) and non-DM (n  = 214) groups. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated and compared.

Results: Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC of FFR were 0.79, 0.96, 0.87, and 0.91 in DM patients and 0.82, 0.93, 0.89, and 0.89 in non-DM patients without significant difference (all p > 0.05) on a per-patient level. The accuracies of FFR had no significant difference among different coronary stenosis subgroups and between two coronary calcium subgroups (all p > 0.05) in the DM and non-DM groups. After PSM grouping, the accuracies of FFR were 0.88 in the DM group and 0.87 in the non-DM group without a statistical difference (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: DM has no negative impact on the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning-based FFR.

Key Points: • ML-based FFR has a high discriminative accuracy of hemodynamic ischemia, which is not affected by DM. • FFR was superior to the CCTA alone for the detection of ischemia relevance of coronary artery stenosis in both DM and non-DM patients. • Coronary calcification had no significant effect on the diagnostic accuracy of FFR to detect ischemia in DM patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08468-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

machine learning-based
12
diagnostic accuracy
12
coronary artery
12
ffr
9
diabetes mellitus
8
coronary
8
learning-based coronary
8
coronary angiography-derived
8
angiography-derived fractional
8
fractional flow
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Delayed neurological sequelae is a common complication following carbon monoxide poisoning, which significantly affects the quality of life of patients with the condition. We aimed to develop a machine learning-based prediction model to predict the frequency of delayed neurological sequelae in patients with carbon monoxide poisoning.

Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted in an emergency department from January 01, 2018, to December 31, 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: As surgical accessibility improves, the incidence of postoperative complications is expected to rise. The implementation of a precise and objective risk stratification tool holds the potential to mitigate these complications by early identification of high-risk patients. Moreover, it could address the escalating costs from resource misallocation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-encapsulated nanoparticles shed from all cells, are tightly involved in critical cellular functions. Moreover, EVs have recently emerged as exciting therapeutic modalities, delivery vectors, and biomarker sources. However, EVs are difficult to characterize, because they are typically small and heterogeneous in size, origin, and molecular content.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!