AI Article Synopsis

  • Medically frail and chronically ill patients in Denmark often lack documented preferences for care upon hospital admission, potentially leading to inappropriate treatment decisions.
  • The study aimed to develop and pilot a Danish version of the POLST form, inspired by a similar American model, to effectively record patients' wishes regarding life-sustaining treatment through discussions with healthcare providers.
  • Feedback from 25 patients indicated that the Danish POLST form was generally readable and helpful, with 93% of participants finding it effective for discussions about their treatment preferences, highlighting the importance of clear communication surrounding patient wishes.

Article Abstract

Background: Medically frail and/or chronically ill patients are often admitted to Danish hospitals without documentation of patient preferences. This may lead to inappropriate care. Modelled on the American Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form, the purpose of the study was to develop and pilot test a Danish POLST form to ensure that patients' preferences for levels of life-sustaining treatment are known and documented.

Methods: The study was a mixed methods study. In the initial phase, a Danish POLST form was developed on the basis of literature and recommendations from the National POLST organisation in the US. A pilot test of the Danish POLST form was conducted in hospital wards, general practitioners' clinics, and nursing homes. Patients were eligible for inclusion if death was assessed as likely within 12 months. The patient and his/her physician engaged in a conversation where patient values, beliefs, goals for care, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment alternatives were discussed. The POLST form was completed based on the patient's values and preferences. Family members and/or nursing staff could participate. Participants' assessments of the POLST form were evaluated using questionnaires, and in-depth interviews were conducted to explore experiences with the POLST form and the conversation.

Results: In total, 25 patients participated, 45 questionnaires were completed and 14 interviews were conducted. Most participants found the POLST form readable and understandable, and 93% found the POLST form usable to a high or very high degree for discussing preferences regarding life-sustaining treatment. Three themes emerged from the interviews: (a) an understandable document is essential for the conversation, (b) handling and discussing wishes, and (c) significance for the future.

Conclusion: The Danish version of the POLST form is assessed by patients, families, physicians, and nurses as a useful model for obtaining and documenting Danish patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatment. However, this needs to be confirmed in a larger-scale study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749111PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00892-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

polst form
44
life-sustaining treatment
20
danish polst
16
polst
12
form
11
patient preferences
8
preferences levels
8
levels life-sustaining
8
pilot test
8
test danish
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!