AI Article Synopsis

  • SARS-CoV-2 can spread through aerosols and droplets during dental procedures, particularly with instruments like high-speed handpieces; this study investigated how effective high-volume evacuators (HVEs) and extraoral vacuum aspirators (EOVAs) are at reducing these particles during ultrasonic scaling.
  • * The study involved testing three different setups on mannequins: a control group with only a saliva ejector, one with a saliva ejector and HVE, and one with both HVE and EOVA, using filters to measure contamination.
  • *Results showed that using both HVE and EOVA significantly decreased the presence of aerosols and droplets compared to using only the saliva ejector, highlighting the need for these devices to improve safety during

Article Abstract

Objective:  SARS-CoV-2 can be carried by aerosols and droplets produced during dental procedures, particularly by the use of high-speed handpieces, air-water syringes, and ultrasonic scalers. High-volume evacuators (HVEs) and extraoral vacuum aspirators (EOVAs) reduce such particles. However, there is limited data on their efficacy. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of HVE and EOVA in reducing aerosols and droplets during ultrasonic scaling procedures.

Materials And Methods:  Three ultrasonic scaling simulations were conducted on mannequins: 1. saliva ejector (SE) was used alone (control); 2. SE was used in combination with HVE; and 3. SE was used in combination with HVE and EOVA. Paper filters were placed on the operator's and assistant's face shields and bodies, and the contamination of aerosols and droplets was measured by counting blue spots on the paper filters.

Statistical Analysis:  All data were analyzed for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The differences between each method were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA, followed by a posthoc test. The differences were considered statistically significant when  < 0.05.

Result:  Using HVE and EOVA reduced aerosols and droplets better than using SE alone or SE and HVE: the posthoc test for contamination revealed a significant difference ( < 0.01). The assistant was subjected to greater contamination than the operator during all three ultrasonic scaling procedures.

Conclusion:  The usage of HVE and EOVA significantly reduced aerosols and droplets compared with using SE solely. Using these techniques together could prevent the transmission of airborne disease during dental cleanings, especially COVID-19. Further studies of aerosol-reducing devices are still needed to ensure the safety of dental workers and patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683881PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1739448DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ultrasonic scaling
12
aerosols droplets
12
high-volume evacuators
8
extraoral vacuum
8
vacuum aspirators
8
hve eova
8
combination hve
8
test differences
8
efficacy high-volume
4
evacuators extraoral
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!