A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Sensitivity and specificity of waterbath ultrasound technique in comparison to the conventional methods in diagnosing extremity fractures. | LitMetric

Introduction: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has variable diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing fractures. Waterbath technique is a modification of the conventional ultrasound technique which may improve diagnostic accuracy by enhancing image quality. Authors studied the diagnostic accuracy of waterbath technique compared to the final diagnosis based on clinical examination and radiology in the identification of fractures of hand and foot.

Methods: Patients of >18 yrs. age with suspected distal hand and foot fractures presenting to the emergency department of a level 1 trauma center were recruited after informed consent. Unconscious and hemodynamically unstable patients, injuries >72 h old, open fractures, obvious deformities, and old fractures at the affected site were excluded. Cases were subjected to waterbath technique performed by an academic emergency medicine resident and relevant radiographs were ordered and interpreted by an orthopedic specialist. CT/MRI, if done in case of discrepancy, was interpreted by radiologist. The findings of both waterbath technique and radiology were blinded to each other and compared to the final diagnosis made by a cumulative assessment of clinical examination, radiographs, and CT/MRI of the discrepant cases.

Results: Waterbath technique identified fractures of hand and foot with sensitivity of 97% (95% CI 90%-100%), specificity 94% (95%CI 81%-99%), PPV 98% (95%CI 91%-99%), NPV 94% (95%CI 79%-98%), LR+ 17.5(95% CI 4.5-67.2), LR- 0.03(95% CI 0.01-0.12) and diagnostic accuracy 96% (95%CI 91%-99%).

Conclusion: This pilot study has demonstrated the utility of Waterbath technique in the diagnosis of fractures of hand and foot in adults in the ED setting. Future well designed studies are required to explore the potential of this novel technique in both adult and pediatric population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.067DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

waterbath technique
24
diagnostic accuracy
16
fractures hand
12
hand foot
12
technique
9
ultrasound technique
8
fractures
8
compared final
8
final diagnosis
8
clinical examination
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!