Background: The 6 min walk test (6MWT) is a validated tool used to assess functional capacity in a variety of patient populations. Space constraints often limit the practicality of the 6MWT according to the standard (2002) American Thoracic Society protocol, and therefore, adaptations to this protocol are common with potential implications for research and clinical practice. Furthermore, such implications for research and clinical practice may be augmented in low-resourced settings.
Objectives: To determine the agreement between the 6 min walk distance (6MWD) achieved on the standard 30 m (6MWT), and a straight 10 m (6MWT), or 10 m figure-of-eight (6MWT) configuration, respectively.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a socioeconomic challenged community. A heterogeneous sample of adults (n = 27) with non-communicable disease were randomized into performing the 6MWT (n = 15) or 6MWT (n = 12), in addition to the standard 6MWT. Pairwise comparison and concordance correlation coefficients were used to assess agreement.
Results: The mean (SD) 6MWD was 437(42) meters, while the mean 6MWD was 371(57). The mean difference (SE; p-value) between the 6MWD and 6MWD was 67 m (8.6; p .01). The mean 6MWD was 424(67) meters, while the mean 6MWD was 347(58). The mean difference between the 6MWD and 6MWD was 77 m (6.0; p .01). Moderate concordance was found between the 6MWT and 6MWT or 6MWD, respectively.
Conclusions: The present data suggest that, independent of configuration, using a shorter pathway significantly reduced the 6MWD. Low-resource settings may benefit from contemporary measures of functional capacity more conducive to resource constraints, or standardization of the test when used in such settings.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.12.008 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!