In most U.S. jurisdictions, clinicians providing informal "curbside" consults are protected from medical malpractice liability due to the absence of a doctor-patient relationship. A recent Minnesota Supreme Court case, Warren v. Dinter, offers the opportunity to reassess whether the majority rule is truly serving the best interests of patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jme.2021.83 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!