Consequences of a Diagnostic Label: A Systematic Scoping Review and Thematic Framework.

Front Public Health

Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare (IEBH), Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

Published: April 2022

To develop a thematic framework for the range of consequences arising from a diagnostic label from an individual, family/caregiver, healthcare professional, and community perspective. Systematic scoping review of qualitative studies. We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and CINAHL for primary studies and syntheses of primary studies that explore the consequences of labelling non-cancer diagnoses. Reference lists of included studies were screened, and forward citation searches undertaken. We included peer reviewed publications describing the perceived consequences for individuals labelled with a non-cancer diagnostic label from four perspectives: that of the individual, their family/caregiver, healthcare professional and/or community members. We excluded studies using hypothetical scenarios. Data extraction used a three-staged process: one third was used to develop a preliminary framework, the next third for framework validation, and the final third coded if thematic saturation was not achieved. Author themes and supporting quotes were extracted, and analysed from the perspective of individual, family/caregiver, healthcare professional, or community member. After deduplication, searches identified 7,379 unique articles. Following screening, 146 articles, consisting of 128 primary studies and 18 reviews, were included. The developed framework consisted of five overarching themes relevant to the four perspectives: (e.g., positive/negative psychological impact, social- and self-identity, stigma), (e.g., increased, decreased, relationship changes, professional interactions), (e.g., action and uncertainty), (e.g., beneficial or detrimental modifications), and . Perspectives of individuals were most frequently reported. This review developed and validated a framework of five domains of consequences following diagnostic labelling. Further research is required to test the external validity and acceptability of the framework for individuals and their family/caregiver, healthcare professionals, and community.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8727520PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.725877DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

family/caregiver healthcare
16
diagnostic label
12
individual family/caregiver
12
healthcare professional
12
primary studies
12
consequences diagnostic
8
systematic scoping
8
scoping review
8
thematic framework
8
professional community
8

Similar Publications

IntroductionPediatric asthma is a common respiratory disease that burdens affected patients, their caregivers, and the entire healthcare system. Uncontrolled asthma ultimately impacts patients' quality of life. There are limited studies examining the factors associated with asthma control and quality of life.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Accidental Synthetic Cannabinoid Poisoning in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report.

Cureus

December 2024

Emergency Medicine, Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, USA.

A six-year-old boy presented to the pediatric emergency department following an accidental ingestion of a synthetic cannabinoid. The child ingested an edible product containing tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and presented with lethargy, altered mental status, and increased muscle tone. The airway was protected, and the patient was breathing spontaneously.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Engraft: A Collaborative Learning Health Network for Enhanced Transplant and Cellular Therapy Outcomes.

Transplant Cell Ther

December 2024

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.

The Engraft Learning Health Network (LHN) aims to improve outcomes for patients undergoing transplant and cellular therapy (TCT) through a collaborative, data-driven approach. Engraft brings together diverse stakeholders, including clinicians, patients, caregivers, and institutions, to standardize best practices and accelerate the dissemination of innovations in TCT care. By establishing a multicenter, real-world clinical registry focused on rapid-cycle quality improvement (QI) and implementation research, Engraft seeks to reduce variability in clinical practice to improve TCT outcomes across centers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: To investigate the current status and influencing factors of fear of disease progression in stroke patients, and to analyze the mediating effect of social support between symptom burden and the fear of disease progression.

Methods: A cross-sectional study recruited 235 stroke patients in a convenience sample from the neurology department of a tertiary hospital in China. The general information questionnaire, social support rating scale, stroke symptom experience scale, and fear of progression questionnaire short form were utilized for the survey.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

People with cystic fibrosis (PwCF), families, and clinicians, partner to co-produce care, navigate access barriers, address mental health and social factors, follow specific infection prevention and control practices, and share decision-making regarding treatments and daily care. Standard patient satisfaction and experience of care surveys are not tailored to return relevant, actionable data for specific populations. To improve the care experience, the U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!