AI Article Synopsis

  • The CAMEL clinical trial involved 412 patients, showing that camrelizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved overall and progression-free survival for those with metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer without specific mutations compared to chemotherapy alone.
  • A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the healthcare system's perspective in China, revealing that camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy was cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -$7,382.72 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
  • The findings indicate that camrelizumab plus chemotherapy is a cost-effective treatment option for this patient group in China, remaining below the $32,457 willingness-to-pay threshold.

Article Abstract

The CAMEL clinical trial (412 patients were randomly assigned to either camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (n = 205) or chemotherapy alone (n = 207)) demonstrated that camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (CC) improved the overall survival time (OS) and progression-free survival time (PFS) of patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-sq NSCLC) without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations (EGFRm and ALKm) vs. chemotherapy (C) alone. Our objective was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of CC vs. C from a perspective of health - care system in China with a lifetime horizon to identify whether it will be cost-effective. A partitioned survival model (PSM) was applied for patients with IIIB-IV non-sq NSCLC without EGFRm and ALKm. Transition parameters and proportions of three health states were derived from the CAMEL trial. The model was designed using a lifetime horizon, a 21-day cycle, and a 5% discount rate of costs and outcomes. It was deemed cost-effective in China if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) value is less than $32,457 per quality adjusted life-year (QALY). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to verify the influence of parameter uncertainty on the results. In the base-case analysis, we found that the ICER of CC compared with C is $-7,382.72/QALY which meant that CC had lower costs and better outcomes. The results of the sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the result was robust for the ICERs never transcending the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy is an obviously cost-effective therapeutic regime for patients of IIIB-IV non-sq NSCLC without EGFRm and ALKm in China at a $32,457 WTP threshold.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740086PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.735536DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

camrelizumab chemotherapy
16
patients iiib-iv
12
non-sq nsclc
12
egfrm alkm
12
cost-effectiveness analysis
8
non-small cell
8
cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
perspective health
8
health care
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!