Aims: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with hip-dislocation dysplasia remains challenging. This study aims to evaluate whether these patients may benefit from robotic-assisted techniques.
Methods: We reviewed 135 THAs (108 conventional THAs and 27 robotic-assisted THAs) for Crowe type III or IV from January 2017 to August 2019 in our institution. Robotic-assisted THAs were matched with conventional THAs at a 1:1 ratio (27 hips each group) using propensity score matching. The accuracy of cup positioning and clinical outcomes were compared between groups.
Results: The inclination of the cup for conventional THAs and robotic THAs was 42.1 ± 5.7 and 41.3 ± 4.6 (p = 0.574), respectively. The anteversion of the cup for conventional THAs was significantly greater than that of robotic THAs (29.5 ± 8.1 and 18.0 ± 4.6; p < 0.001), respectively. The ratio of the acetabular cup in the Lewinnek safe zone was 37% (10/27) in conventional THAs and 96.3% (26/27) in robotic THAs (p < 0.001). Robotic THAs did not achieve better leg length discrepancy than that of conventional THAs (- 0.4 ± 10.9 mm vs. 0.4 ± 8.8 mm, p = 0.774). There was no difference in Harris Hip Score and WOMAC Osteoarthritis index between groups at the 2-year follow-up. No dislocation occurred in all cases at the final follow-up.
Conclusion: Robotic-assisted THA for patients with high dislocation improves the accuracy of the implantation of the acetabular component with respect to safe zone.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05232-w | DOI Listing |
J Arthroplasty
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, SA, Australia; Discipline of Medical Specialties, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; College of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a well-established treatment for symptomatic hip osteoarthritis (OA). The use of computer navigation in THA aims to achieve the reconstruction of the joint more consistently and precisely. The aim of this study was to contrast patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for THA procedures with and without commercially available navigation technologies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Orthop
April 2025
The Rubin Institute for Advance Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Introduction: The adoption of new techniques, such as the direct anterior (DA) approach, and technologies, such as robotic assistance, in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has the potential to alleviate the intraoperative physical and mental demand that surgeons experience. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the physical and mental demand of surgeons performing conventional DA THA with fluoroscopy and robotic-assisted DA THA without fluoroscopy.
Methods: Two orthopaedic surgeons completed bilateral DA THA's on six cadaveric specimens.
Surg Technol Int
November 2024
West Virginia University, Department of Orthopaedics, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Introduction: Acetabular component placement is critical for total hip arthroplasty (THA) stability and clinical outcomes. We investigated cup placement with robotic-arm assisted (RA) and conventional manual (CM) THA and compared patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and dislocations.
Materials And Methods: Thirty-seven patients were randomized to undergo RA or CM primary THA.
J Clin Med
October 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, 1200 E Broad St., 9th Floor, P.O. Box 980153, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Hip Int
November 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!