Careless responding is a bias in survey responses that disregards the actual item content, constituting a threat to the factor structure, reliability, and validity of psychological measurements. Different approaches have been proposed to detect aberrant responses such as probing questions that directly assess test-taking behavior (e.g., bogus items), auxiliary or paradata (e.g., response times), or data-driven statistical techniques (e.g., Mahalanobis distance). In the present study, gradient boosted trees, a state-of-the-art machine learning technique, are introduced to identify careless respondents. The performance of the approach was compared with established techniques previously described in the literature (e.g., statistical outlier methods, consistency analyses, and response pattern functions) using simulated data and empirical data from a web-based study, in which diligent versus careless response behavior was experimentally induced. In the simulation study, gradient boosting machines outperformed traditional detection mechanisms in flagging aberrant responses. However, this advantage did not transfer to the empirical study. In terms of precision, the results of both traditional and the novel detection mechanisms were unsatisfactory, although the latter incorporated response times as additional information. The comparison between the results of the simulation and the online study showed that responses in real-world settings seem to be much more erratic than can be expected from the simulation studies. We critically discuss the generalizability of currently available detection methods and provide an outlook on future research on the detection of aberrant response patterns in survey research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8725053PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00131644211004708DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

careless responding
8
gradient boosting
8
aberrant responses
8
response times
8
study gradient
8
detection mechanisms
8
response
5
study
5
detecting careless
4
responding survey
4

Similar Publications

Objective: This study aimed to translate and validate the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale into Traditional Chinese (ChARMS-T) and to investigate common barriers to medication adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Taiwan.

Methods: The ChARMS-T was developed through translation and application phases. During the translation phase, the scale underwent forward translation, backward translation, and cognitive debriefing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study investigates the participation rate and compliance of university students in a 15-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study focused on mental health, finding a participation rate of 62.1% and mean compliance of 76.9%.
  • Factors influencing participation included higher participation rates among women and lower rates in older students and those with recent traumatic experiences, such as the death of a loved one or a suicide attempt.
  • The research also assessed the reliability of measures for positive and negative affect and identified a concern for careless responding among participants with low compliance or reliability scores.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In ecological momentary assessment (EMA), respondents answer brief questionnaires about their current behaviours or experiences several times per day across multiple days. The frequent measurement enables a thorough grasp of the dynamics inherent in psychological constructs, but it also increases respondent burden. To lower this burden, respondents may engage in careless and insufficient effort responding (C/IER), leaving data contaminated with responses that do not reflect what researchers want to measure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study applied social learning theory to understand how university students learned new health behaviors that impact their mental health through social media use. A cross-sectional research design was adopted with quantitative research methods to conduct the study. Data were collected using online questionnaires from a sample of 453 university students in Cameroon, Uganda and Nigeria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In cases of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis that does not respond to topical therapy, temporary systemic administration of molecular targeted drugs (biological agents or oral Janus kinase[JAK]inhibitors) may be necessary. However, topical therapy forms the basis of the treatment for atopic dermatitis, and if topical therapy is appropriately established with long-term remission achieved, the use of molecular targeted drugs can be discontinued. In these two cases of severe adolescent atopic dermatitis, successful initiation of remission was achieved through hospitalization, disease education, skincare guidance, and the combined use of appropriate topical therapy and short-term oral JAK inhibitors during the remission induction phase.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!