Coal macrolithotypes are closely correlated with coal macerals and pore-fracture structures, which greatly influence the changes in gas content and the coal structure. Traditional macrolithotype identification in coalbed methane (CBM) wells mostly depends on core drilling observation, which is expensive, time-consuming, and difficult for broken core extraction. Geophysical logging is a quick and effective method to address this issue. We obtained coal cores from 75 wells in the deep regions of the Jiaozuo Coalfield, northern China, quantitatively analyzed the logging cutoff number corresponding to various macrolithotypes, and established natural γ (GR), deep lateral resistivity (LLD), and γ-γ log (GGL) response rules for each coal macrolithotype. The formation mechanisms of different coal macrolithotypes are discussed from the perspective of coal facies and pore structures. The results show that GGL decreased but GR and LLD increased from bright coal to dull coal. Most coal macrolithotypes can be distinguished based on the established thresholds of various logging curves. However, excessively high or low ash yields significantly affect the validity of identification. The vertical coal macrolithotypes attributed to the peat marsh environment in Shanxi Formation mostly comprise three to six sublayers; dull or semi-dull coals are predominant close to the 2 coal seam, and the bright or semi-bright types usually appear in the middle part. The semi-bright and bright coals are usually vitrinite rich, whereas the semi-dull and dull coals are primarily inertinite rich. For pore structure arguments, the highest average specific surface area ( ) and the total pore volume ( ) are found in bright coals, followed by dull and semi-bright coals; those of semi-dull coals are the lowest. However, and V change significantly for different samples, even though the coal macrolithotype is the same. Therefore, the macrolithotype is not the key factor determining the coal parameters of pore structures. Rapid and effective identification of coal macrolithotypes can help determine the CBM enrichment area, the CBM well location, and the exploration horizon.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717541PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c05012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coal macrolithotypes
20
coal
16
coal macrolithotype
12
jiaozuo coalfield
8
geophysical logging
8
pore structures
8
semi-dull coals
8
bright coals
8
macrolithotypes
6
coals
6

Similar Publications

Coal body desorption characteristics are one of the key factors that influence the development of coalbed methane (CBM). In this study, 91 coal core samples from 11 CBM wells in the Fukang mining area were collected from Xinjiang, China, and the coal quality, high-pressure mercury compression, gas content, and natural desorption characteristics measurements were launched. With the detailed analyses of the differences in cumulative desorption volume, desorption ratio, and on-site average desorption rate for the coal samples with different body structures and macrolithotypes, the influence of the maximum reflectance of vitrinite, microscopic coal rock composition, and coal quality and pore characteristics on CBM desorption characteristics were discussed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Coal macrolithotypes are closely correlated with coal macerals and pore-fracture structures, which greatly influence the changes in gas content and the coal structure. Traditional macrolithotype identification in coalbed methane (CBM) wells mostly depends on core drilling observation, which is expensive, time-consuming, and difficult for broken core extraction. Geophysical logging is a quick and effective method to address this issue.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!