[Propofol in urological endoscopy in elderly patients. Comparison with methohexital].

Twenty patients undergoing cystoscopy (group A) and forty patients undergoing transurethral resection (group B), aged more than 65 years, were anaesthetized. Duration of anaesthesia was less than 15 min for cystoscopy, and more than 30 min for transurethral resection. No premedication was given. The patients were ASA I or ASA II. Group A patients were allocated randomly to receive either 1.5 mg . kg-1 propofol (n = 10) or 2 mg . kg-1 methohexitone (n = 10) for induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was maintained using incremental doses of propofol or methohexitone and 60% N2O with a face-mask. Forty group B patients undergoing transurethral resection were randomly assigned to four equal groups (PB: propofol 1.5 mg . kg-1; MB: methohexitone 2 mg . kg-1; PF: propofol and 1.5 micrograms . kg-1 fentanyl; PFV: propofol, 2 micrograms . kg-1 fentanyl and 0.1 mg . kg-1 vecuronium). Suxamethonium (1 mg . kg-1; groups PB, MB and PF) and vecuronium (0.1 mg . kg-1; group PFV) were given to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Anaesthesia was maintained by infusion of propofol or methohexitone, using a calibrated pump started immediately after intubation. Ventilation was controlled only in group PFV. Induction with 1.5 mg . kg-1 propofol resulted in stopping counting after 62 s and loss of the eye-lash reflex after 84 s versus 47 and 67 s respectively with methohexitone. The anaesthesist's assessment was favourable for cystoscopy with propofol and methohexitone; recovery times were similar for the two drugs in cystoscopy lasting less than 30 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)