Introduction: Apremilast is approved for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Real-world evidence on the efficacy and safety of apremilast in clinical practice is limited. We assessed the use of apremilast in patients with PsA in Belgium clinical practice.
Methods: The multicentre, observational, prospective APOLO study enrolled patients with active PsA initiating apremilast in Belgium between April 2017 and December 2018. Primary outcome was PsA Response Criteria (PsARC) after 6 months of apremilast treatment. Secondary outcomes included PsA Impact of Disease 12 (PsAID12) and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Disease-specific outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were analysed for patients who received apremilast within 30 days prior to their study inclusion and completed at least 150 days of treatment (reference set [REF]).
Results: Of 107 patients enrolled in the study, 106 received at least one dose of apremilast and 69 were included in the REF. PsARC response was achieved by 43.5% of patients (30/69) in the REF at month 6; mean global and composite scores including 68-joint count for pain/tenderness (68-TJC) and 66-joint count for swelling (66-SJC) improved, and 27% and 42% of patients with 68-TJC and 66-SJC > 0 at baseline had complete joint count resolution, respectively. Mean global and composite PsAID12 and HAQ-DI scores decreased at 6 months, indicating improved quality of life. Apremilast was well tolerated and the reported adverse events were in line with the known safety profile.
Conclusion: Results from the APOLO study indicate that treatment with apremilast in Belgian clinical practice improves the signs and symptoms of PsA as well as patient quality of life. CLINICALTRIALS.
Gov Identifier: NCT03096990.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866349 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-02016-x | DOI Listing |
J Clin Med
October 2024
Pfizer Hellas SA, 15451 Neo Psichiko, Greece.
Bladder Cancer
October 2024
Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer represents a potentially curable disease, yet often disease recurs and is ultimately fatal. Outcomes for patients with localized urothelial carcinoma are heterogeneous with some patients cured with surgery alone, deriving no benefit from perioperative systemic therapy, while others are left with residual disease and may benefit from additional therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases cure rates but comes with significant toxicity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFuture Oncol
October 2024
Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ann Vasc Surg
January 2025
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Background: Multicenter studies conducted in developed countries demonstrated that custom-made devices are safe, effective, and durable for treating complex abdominal aneurysms. However, the situation in developing countries, such as Brazil, is different. Funding and time to have the endoprosthesis delivered are the major concerns.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUrol Oncol
September 2024
Department of Urology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX. Electronic address:
Despite surgical resection, many patients with muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) experience recurrence. Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) following radical resection in patients with MIUC demonstrates disparate outcomes among phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our objective was to synthesize available data regarding the disease-free survival (DFS) benefit of adjuvant ICIs for patients with MIUC and evaluate the overall safety profile of ICIs in this setting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!