A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Effectiveness of Capnography Versus Pulse Oximetry in Detecting Respiratory Adverse Events in the Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU): A Narrative Review and Synthesis. | LitMetric

Purpose: The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of capnography monitoring versus standard monitoring of pulse oximetry in detecting respiratory adverse events in nonintubated pediatric and adult postanesthesia care unit (PACU) patients.

Design: Experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational studies examining pulse oximetry and capnography in adult and pediatric patients in the PACU were included in this systematic review.

Methods: An initial search of MEDLINE and CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, Prospero, Google Scholar, and Cochrane was undertaken to identify articles on the topic. The text words contained in the titles and abstracts of relevant articles, and the index terms used to describe the articles were used to develop a full search strategy in July 2019. Reference lists of studies included at critical appraisal stage were hand-searched. Studies published in English from 1978 onward were included.

Findings: Meta-analysis was not possible due to variation in outcome measurements; therefore, results are presented in narrative form. Four studies were included in the review: 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 3 observational cross-sectional studies. The RCT was considered of moderate to high quality, and the observational cross-sectional studies were of high quality. The main findings of this review suggest that there is limited high-quality evidence that capnography improves detection of respiratory adverse events in the PACU versus pulse oximetry.

Conclusions: The lack of RCTs and varied outcomes measures in the 4 studies reviewed meant that meta-analysis was not possible. Early detection of respiratory adverse events afforded by the addition of PETCO to SpO in the PACU was seen in these studies. More research is needed to determine if widespread implementation of capnography in addition to pulse oximetry would reduce severity of respiratory related adverse events in the PACU through more timely identification.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2021.03.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

respiratory adverse
20
adverse events
20
pulse oximetry
16
effectiveness capnography
8
versus pulse
8
oximetry detecting
8
detecting respiratory
8
postanesthesia care
8
care unit
8
unit pacu
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!