Pharmacoepidemiology for oncology clinical practice: Foundations, state of the art and perspectives.

Therapie

Department of clinical pharmacology, Bordeaux University Hospital, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Université Bordeaux, Inserm, BPH, U1219, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, 33000 Bordeaux, France. Electronic address:

Published: April 2022

Since the early 2000s, the arrival of the so-called targeted therapies and immunotherapies have prolonged survival rates in many cancers. In parallel, post-marketing surveillance of anticancer drugs through pharmacoepidemiology has gradually developed. This paper provides (i) a detailed argumentation of the foundations for pharmacoepidemiology of anticancer drugs, (ii) an overview of pharmacoepidemiological studies currently available in this field, and (iii) some perspectives to improve pharmacoepidemiology for oncology practice. First of all, according to the existing literature, the development of pharmacoepidemiological studies for the clinical evaluation of anticancer drugs appears particularly justified based on common limitations of clinical trials in oncology regarding essential methodological principles such as adequate control groups, randomisation or double blinding. Many descriptive field cohort studies have investigated together treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety to compare results from clinical trials with those of everyday practice. The utilisation of anticancer drugs has also been extensively described through cross-sectional or cohort studies by often using medico-administrative or medical databases. Such studies are useful to quantify and characterise use over time in the population, including clinically unvalidated use, and to evaluate adherence and persistence to increasingly available oral anticancer drugs. Despite their importance to increase knowledge, comparative effectiveness or safety studies remain uncommon. In a context of rapidly emerging therapies and personalised treatments, this may be due to methodological challenges especially related to the choice of a comparator or the consideration of confounding by indication. In the future, efforts must be pursued to provide real-time access to high-quality, large-scale clinical, biological and treatment data, and to improve record-linkage between hospital and outpatient databases. More research is also needed to better evaluate all medications, not only anticancer, as part of an overall cancer care pathway and to bring the evaluation of anticancer drugs closer to patients and society (social pharmacology).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2021.08.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anticancer drugs
24
pharmacoepidemiology oncology
8
pharmacoepidemiological studies
8
evaluation anticancer
8
clinical trials
8
cohort studies
8
effectiveness safety
8
anticancer
7
drugs
6
studies
6

Similar Publications

Liver cancer poses a global health challenge with limited therapeutic options. Notably, the limited success of current therapies in patients with primary liver cancers (PLCs) may be attributed to the high heterogeneity of both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCCs) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCAs). This heterogeneity evolves over time as tumor-initiating stem cells, or cancer stem cells (CSCs), undergo (epi)genetic alterations or encounter microenvironmental changes within the tumor microenvironment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aims to synthesize a new localized drug delivery system of bioglass, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), cellulose (CNC), and sodium alginate (SA) beads as a carrier for methotrexate (MTX) drugs for the treatment of osteosarcoma. Methotrexate /Bioglass-loaded Polyvinyl/Cellulose/Sodium alginate biocomposite beads were prepared via the dropwise method with different concentrations of (65%SiO-30%CaO- 5%PO) bioglass. Samples were named B0, S0, S1, S2, and S3, respectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Drug discovery and development is a challenging and time-consuming process. Laboratory experiments conducted on Vidarabine showed IC 6.97 µg∕mL, 25.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dual-targeting inhibitors involving tubulin for the treatment of cancer.

Bioorg Chem

December 2024

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India; Department of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS) Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Dist. Medchal, 500078 TS, India. Electronic address:

Combination therapies play a pivotal role in cancer treatment due to the intricate nature of the disease. Tubulin, a protein crucial for cellular functions, is a prime target in tumor therapy as it regulates microtubule dynamics. Combining tubulin inhibitors with other different inhibitors as dual targeting inhibitors has shown synergistic anti-tumor effects, amplifying therapeutic outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Design, synthesis, and antitumor evaluation of triazolopyridine derivatives as novel inhibitors for BRD4.

Eur J Med Chem

January 2025

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Drug Design & Optimization, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 211198, PR China. Electronic address:

The bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) is an epigenetic regulatory 'reader' belonging to the bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) family. Several studies have demonstrated that the high expression of BRD4 is closely related to the occurrence and development of various cancers, so BRD4 has become a promising target for cancer treatment. However, there are no drugs targeting BRD4 available on the market, the development of novel BRD4 inhibitors is of great significance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!