Biomechanics influence sexual dimorphism in the giant mesquite bug, Thasus neocalifornicus.

In many species, males possess specialized weaponry that confers benefits during male-male combat. Because male weapons are often disproportionately larger versions of preexisting body parts, females often possess reduced versions of male weaponry. Most research focuses exclusively on sexual dimorphism in the size of male and female weapons, even though other aspects such as weapon performance can also explain the evolution of weapon sexual dimorphism. In the giant mesquite bug, Thasus neocalifornicus, males wield exaggerated hindlegs that aid in locomotion and are used as weapons to generate forceful squeezes during combat. However, female T. neocalifornicus hindlegs are relatively inconspicuous and only used for locomotion. To understand the intricacies of weapon sexual dimorphism in T. neocalifornicus hindlegs, we measured the allometry of their hindlegs morphology, biomechanics, and performance. Males and females had relatively similar sized legs when concerning only linear measurements: hindleg length did not differ between the sexes (both for intercept and slope), but males do have relatively wider hindlegs (greater intercepts). Regarding performance, however, males were relatively and proportionally stronger than females. Furthermore, the output lever of male hindlegs scales hypoallometrically and the tibial spine maintains its position as the hindlegs grows, both of which maintain the hindlegs' biomechanical efficiency as they increase in size. Overall, our finding demonstrates that selection on the performance and biomechanics of sexually selected weapons can influence the expression of sexual dimorphism, by exaggerating some aspects of the weapons morphology-but constraining others.