Background: Modularity is an integral element of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Glenosphere diameter is a key component, but its effect on revision rate is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between glenosphere size and revision rates in RTSA procedures.
Methods: Data from a large national arthroplasty registry were analyzed for the period April 2004 to 31 December 2019. The study population included all primary RTSA procedures using glenosphere sizes <38 mm, 38-40 mm, and >40 mm. A subanalysis of glenosphere sizes for each of the 3 most commonly implanted prostheses and further analyses by patient age and gender were also performed. The rate of revision was determined by Kaplan-Meier estimates, with comparisons by Cox proportional hazard models.
Results: There were 28,817 primary RTSA procedures. Glenosphere sizes <38 mm had a higher revision rate compared to 38-40-mm glenospheres (hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11, 1.48, P < .001) and >40-mm sizes (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.15, 1.59, P < .001). Males with <38-mm and 38-40-mm glenospheres had significantly higher revision rates compared to >40-mm glenospheres (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.21, 1.83, P < .001; and HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03, 1.58, P = .025, respectively). Females with <38-mm and >40-mm glenospheres had higher revision rates compared to females with 38-40-mm glenospheres (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14, 1.68, P < .001; and HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06, 1.88, P = .019, respectively). For patients aged 65-74 years, glenospheres >40 mm had a significantly lower revision rate than both the <38-mm glenospheres (entire period: HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45, 0.76, P < .001) and 38-40-mm glenospheres (entire period: HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54, 0.94, P = .017). For patients aged ≥75 years (n = 14,622), <38-mm glenospheres had a significantly higher rate of revision compared with 38-40-mm glenospheres after 3 months (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.09, 1.86, P = .009). Analysis comparing glenosphere sizes within each of the 3 most commonly implanted prostheses found that the Delta Xtend with 38-40-mm glenospheres had higher revision rates compared with >40-mm glenospheres (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.14, 1.92, P = .003). The SMR L1 (Lima) 38-40-mm glenospheres had a lower rate of revision compared with the <38-mm (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.37, 0.67, P < .001) and >40-mm glenospheres (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43, 0.85, P = .004).
Conclusions: Glenospheres <38 mm can be expected to increase revision rates in primary RTSAs. The optimum size of glenospheres is gender, age, and prosthesis specific, with revision rates lower for females with 38-40-mm glenospheres and lower for males with >40-mm glenospheres.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.11.013 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess impingement-free internal rotation (IR) in a virtual reverse shoulder arthroplasty simulation using a Statistical Shape Model based on scapula size.
Methods: A database of over 10,000 scapulae utilized for preoperative planning for shoulder arthroplasty was analyzed with a Statistical Shape Model to obtain 5 scapula sizes including the mean and 2 standard deviations. For each scapula model, one glenosphere size (33-42 mm) was selected as the best fit based on consensus among 3 shoulder surgeons.
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Implant Design and Configuration has a Significant Effect on Conjoint Tendon Impingement.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
December 2024
Roth | McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St Joseph's Health Care, London, Canada; Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Canada. Electronic address:
Background: Anterior shoulder pain after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is not uncommon and may be due to humeral impingement against the conjoint tendon during internal rotation (IR). It is unknown what effect different implant designs and configurations have on conjoint tendon impingement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of several RSA implant design parameters on conjoint tendon impingement during IR.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLarge variability in degree of constraint of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty liners between different implant systems.
Bone Jt Open
October 2024
Kardinal Schwarzenberg Clinic, Schwarzach im Pongau, Austria.
Article Synopsis
- The study aimed to compare the constraint levels of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) liners from different implant systems, focusing on how design affects stability.
- Using 3D planning software, measurements of jump height, stability ratio, and angle of coverage were conducted for various liner sizes to evaluate differences among implant systems.
- Results indicated significant variability in stability ratios and jump heights between different rTSA systems, with some systems maintaining consistency in stability across sizes while others showed considerable inconsistencies.
A gender and size specific evaluation of Grammont-type inlay versus lateralizing onlay stem designs in achieving lateralization and distalization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
September 2024
Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rhoen Klinik, Bad Neustadt/Saale, Germany.
Introduction: In reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) new designs enable greater amounts of lateralization to prevent instability and scapular notching and increase range of motion, however, excessive lateralization leads to stress upon the acromion that can result in scapular spine fatigue fractures. Aim of this study was to gender- and size-specifically assess the influence of glenosphere size and different humeral designs on lateralization, distalization, and bony impingement-free range of motion (ROM) in patients undergoing RSA.
Methods: Computed tomography scans from 30 osteoarthritic patients (f:15, m:15) and 20 cuff tear arthropathy patients (f:10, m:10) were used to virtually simulate RSA implantation.
Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Algorithms Versus Standard Linear Demographic Analysis in Predicting Implant Size of Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev
August 2024
From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Health System, Maywood, IL (Dr. Boubekri, Dr. Murphy, Dr. Scheidt, Mr. Shivdasani, Mr. Anderson, Dr. Garbis, and Dr. Salazar), the Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Champaign, IL (Mr. Shivdasani).
Background: Accurate and precise templating is paramount for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to enhance preoperative planning, streamline surgery, and improve implant positioning. We aimed to evaluate the predictive potential of readily available patient demographic data in TSA and RSA implant sizing, independent of implant design.
Methods: A total of 578 consecutive, primary, noncemented shoulder arthroplasty cases were retrospectively reviewed.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!