Managing Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability-Techniques and Outcomes: a Scoping Review.

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Published: December 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • This scoping review examines recent literature (last 5 years) on managing bone loss in anterior shoulder instability, particularly focusing on high-risk patients after soft tissue stabilization methods like Bankart repair.
  • Recent findings highlight that traditional repairs may not suffice for patients with specific bone loss conditions, and suggest combining surgeries like remplissage or Latarjet to enhance stability and reduce recurrence.
  • The review also identifies gaps in high-quality evidence for the best treatment options and stresses the need for standardized outcome measures in future studies to improve evaluation of surgical effectiveness.

Article Abstract

Purpose Of Review: The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the literature published over the past 5 years related to the management of bone loss in anterior shoulder instability.

Recent Findings: During recent years, there has been a focus on patients at high risk for failure following soft tissue anterior stabilization (Bankart repair). A growing body of evidence suggests that anterior capsulolabral repair is insufficient in the setting of subcritical glenoid bone loss with an off-track Hill Sachs lesion. In such cases, the addition of a remplissage procedure to a Bankart repair or a bone-block augmentation to the glenoid (Latarjet, for example) is often advocated to decrease the risk of recurrent instability. Recent studies have also evaluated the role of alternative bone-block procedures in comparison to the Latarjet, outcomes with arthroscopic and open techniques as well as various fixation methods and radiological outcomes (bone graft resorption, glenohumeral osteoarthritis). Advances in our understanding of subcritical glenoid bone loss and the glenoid track concept have significantly impacted clinical decision making and treatment selection. The development of arthroscopic techniques has allowed for minimally invasive and safe arthroscopic bone-block procedures as an alternative to open procedures. Further research related to free bone-block procedures will inform long-term outcomes between these procedures and the gold standard Latarjet. Additionally, high-quality evidence is lacking to identify the ideal treatment for patients with glenoid subcritical glenoid bone defect. Variability in outcome reporting suggests the need to standardize outcome measures for future instability trials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373751PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12178-021-09727-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bone loss
16
subcritical glenoid
12
glenoid bone
12
bone-block procedures
12
scoping review
8
bankart repair
8
glenoid
6
bone
5
procedures
5
managing bone
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!