AI Article Synopsis

  • Rapid weight loss after gastric bypass surgery increases the risk of gallstones, particularly common bile duct stones, making extraction more challenging due to altered anatomy.
  • A study analyzed 55 patients in Sweden who underwent gallstone surgery after gastric bypass from 2009-2013, reviewing various management methods used to treat common bile duct stones.
  • While specific complications were low, results showed longer operation times and hospital stays for certain procedures, highlighting a need for improved techniques and more extensive studies on managing these cases.

Article Abstract

Rapid weight loss following gastric bypass (GBP) predisposes to the development of gallstones, and in those who develop gallstone disease there is a high prevalence of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Furthermore, in these patients, CBDS are difficult to extract due to the altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy following GBP. The aim of the present study was to assess outcome after various management methods applied in the counties of Stockholm and Uppsala, Sweden. Data from the Swedish Register for Gallstone Surgery and ERCP (GallRiks) and the Swedish Obesity Surgery Register (SoReg) were crossmatched to identify all patients who had undergone gallstone surgery after GBP, where CBDS were found at intraoperative cholangiography, in the Stockholm and Uppsala counties 2009-2013. A retrospective review of patient records was performed for all patients identified. In all, 55 patients were identified. These were managed as follows: expectancy ( = 11); transgastric ERCP ( = 2); laparoscopic choledochotomy ( = 3); open choledochotomy ( = 5); transcystic stone extraction ( = 12); and other approach ( = 13). In nine cases, data on management could not be found. There were nine cases of minor postoperative complication. No retained stones were registered. The operation time was longer for transgastric ERCP ( = 0.002), and the postoperative stay was longer following open and laparoscopic choledochotomy ( < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between any of the methods regarding the incidence of postoperative complications ( = 0.098). Further development of techniques for managing CBDS discovered in patients undergoing cholecystectomy after previous GBP are needed, as well as more comparative studies with greater statistical power.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8694057PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.789231DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

common bile
8
bile duct
8
duct stones
8
gastric bypass
8
stockholm uppsala
8
gallstone surgery
8
patients identified
8
transgastric ercp
8
laparoscopic choledochotomy
8
patients
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!