A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Predictive Value of Elliptical Neck Parameters and Oversizing Ratio for Type Ia Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. | LitMetric

Purpose: To assess the predictive value of geometric parameters for type Ia endoleak (T1AEL) after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and to determine the range of optimal oversizing ratio (OSR) in patients with an elliptical cross-section of the aneurysm neck.

Materials And Methods: A propensity score-matched case-control study was conducted. Case patients were those who were diagnosed with T1AEL and control patients were those who did not have T1AEL after endovascular aneurysm repair during the period from 2012 to 2018. Geometric and oversizing parameters were compared based on both 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional measurements. Net reclassification improvement was used to measure the prediction increment of an elliptical model (major axis OSR, neck length, and severe neck angulation) compared with that of the conventional model (OSR 2D, neck length, and severe neck angulation).

Results: Nineteen case patients and 111 control patients were included. The median OSR 2D of patients with T1AEL was 17% (interquartile range, 15%-22%), but the median major axis OSR was only 7% (interquartile range, 5%-12%). For the geometric parameters, axis difference had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.84) for predicting T1AEL. For the elliptical oversizing parameters, the major axis OSR had an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-0.97), with a cutoff value of 13%. The elliptical model had a higher discriminating ability for T1AEL than the conventional model (AUC 0.91 vs 0.86, respectively; P = .045), with an improved reclassification ability (net reclassification improvement, 27.93%; 95% CI, 19.22%-36.64%; P < .0001).

Conclusions: Elliptical aneurysm neck cross-section, assessed by the difference between axis dimensions in the plane orthogonal to the centerline, was associated with an increased risk of T1AEL. The prescription of major axis oversizing of at least 13% can significantly reduce the risk of T1AEL formation in patients with an elliptical aneurysm neck.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2021.12.020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

major axis
16
aneurysm repair
12
axis osr
12
oversizing ratio
8
endovascular aneurysm
8
geometric parameters
8
t1ael
8
t1ael endovascular
8
osr patients
8
patients elliptical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!