: Producing consistent measures of femoral version amongst observers are necessary to allow for an assessment of version for possible corrective procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare two computed tomography (CT)-based techniques for the reliability of measuring femoral version amongst observers. : Review was performed for 15 patients post-femoral nailing for comminuted (Winquist III and IV) femoral shaft fractures where CT scanograms were obtained. Two CT-based techniques were utilized to measure femoral version by five observers. : The mean femoral version, when utilizing a proximal line drawn down the center of the femoral head-neck through CT, was 9.50 ± 4.82°, while the method utilizing the head and shaft at lesser trochanter centers produced a mean version of 18.73 ± 2.69°. A significant difference was noted between these two ( ≤ 0.001). The method of measuring in the center of the femoral head and neck produced an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.960 with a 95% confidence interval lower bound of 0.909 and upper bound of 0.982. For the method assessing version via the center of the head and shaft at the lesser trochanter region, the ICC was 0.993 with a 95% confidence interval lower bound of 0.987 and an upper bound of 0.996. : The method of measuring version proximally through a CT image of the femoral head-neck versus overlaying the femoral head with the femoral shaft at the most prominent aspect of the lesser trochanter produces differing version measurements by roughly 10° while yielding an almost perfect interobserver reliability in the new technique. Both techniques result in significantly high interobserver reliability.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707906 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121363 | DOI Listing |
J Bone Joint Surg Am
January 2025
Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, England.
Background: In this study, we estimated the risk of surgically treated postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) associated with femoral implants frequently used for total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Methods: In this cohort study of patients who underwent primary THA in England between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020, POPFFs were identified from prospectively collected revision records and national hospital records. POPFF incidence rates, adjusting for potential confounders, were estimated for common stems.
J Bone Joint Surg Am
January 2025
Institute for Global Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Background: Although delays in musculoskeletal care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are well documented in the open fracture literature, the impact of surgical delays on closed fractures is not well understood. This study aimed to assess the impact of surgical delay on the risk of infection in closed long-bone fractures treated with intramedullary nailing in LMICs.
Methods: Using the SIGN (Surgical Implant Generation Network) Surgical Database, patients ≥16 years of age who were treated with intramedullary nailing for closed diaphyseal femoral and tibial fractures from January 2018 to December 2021 were identified.
J Bone Joint Surg Am
October 2024
Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Background: Fixation of distal femoral fractures remains a challenge, and nonunions are common with standard constructs. Far cortical locking (FCL) constructs have been purported to lead to improved fracture-healing as compared with that achieved with traditional locking bridge plates. We sought to test this hypothesis in a comparative effectiveness clinical trial.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Arthroplasty
January 2025
Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA. Electronic address:
Background: The ideal anteversion at which the acetabular and femoral components for a total hip arthroplasty (THA) should be implanted is still a subject of debate. One alignment philosophy being explored is restoration of individual constitutional femoral and acetabular anteversion. This study aimed to measure combined anteversion in a healthy hip population and understand the expected phenotypes and ranges for constitutional hip alignment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!