AI Article Synopsis

  • The study reviews the effectiveness of beta-lactams (BLs) and fluoroquinolones (FQs) as monotherapy for treating Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infections in adults.
  • It included a systematic analysis of six studies with 338 patients, finding that FQ monotherapy led to significantly better survival rates compared to BL monotherapy in cases of PA bacteremia.
  • However, both FQ and BL monotherapies showed similar rates of bacteriological eradication for PA pneumonia and skin infections, indicating that while FQs are more effective for survival, BLs may still be viable for other types of infections.

Article Abstract

Introduction: (PA) is a leading cause of healthcare-associated infections. A variety of antibiotic classes are used in the treatment of PA infections, including beta-lactams (BLs) and fluoroquinolones (FQs), given either together in combination therapy or alone in monotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of BL agents versus FQ agents as active, definitive monotherapy in PA infections in adults.

Methods: Comprehensive literature searches of the Medline and Scopus electronic databases, alongside hand searches of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, and Google Scholar, were performed without a time restriction to identify studies published in English comparing BL and FQ agents given as monotherapy for PA infection in hospitalized adults for which mortality, bacteriological eradication, or clinical response was evaluated. One reviewer screened search results based on pre-defined selection criteria. Two reviewers independently assessed included studies for methodological quality using NIH assessment tools. Two fixed-effects meta-analyses were performed.

Results: A total of 368 articles were screened, and six studies involving 338 total patients were included in the meta-analysis. Upon evaluation of methodological quality, two studies were rated good, three fair, and one poor. A meta-analysis of three studies demonstrates FQ monotherapy is associated with significantly improved survival compared to BL monotherapy for patients with PA bacteremia (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.27-10.44; = 0.02). A meta-analysis of three studies demonstrates FQ monotherapy is associated with equivalent bacteriological eradication compared to BL monotherapy for PA pneumonia or skin and soft tissue infection (RD, 0.07; 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.24; = 0.39).

Conclusion: The meta-analyses demonstrate FQ monotherapy significantly improves survival in PA bacteremia and is associated with similar rates of bacteriological eradication in pneumonia and skin and soft tissue infection caused by PA compared to BL monotherapy. However, more research is needed to make meaningful clinical recommendations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8698261PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10121483DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bacteriological eradication
12
compared monotherapy
12
monotherapy
10
monotherapy infection
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
methodological quality
8
meta-analysis three
8
three studies
8
studies demonstrates
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!