AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of type-2 diabetes screening strategies in Vietnam, analyzing different healthcare settings and screening intervals.
  • Annual screening at commune health stations (CHS) and district health centers (DHC) is found to be cost-effective, with CHS screening from age 40 yielding the best value.
  • The results support incorporating T2DM screening into Vietnam's health benefits package, enhancing healthcare accessibility and efficiency.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Few economic evaluations have assessed the cost-effectiveness of screening type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in different healthcare settings. This study aims to evaluate the value for money of various T2DM screening strategies in Vietnam.

Methods: A decision analytical model was constructed to compare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of T2DM screening in different health care settings, including (1) screening at commune health station (CHS) and (2) screening at district health center (DHC), with no screening as the current practice. We further explored the costs and QALYs of different initial screening ages and different screening intervals. Cost and utility data were obtained by primary data collection in Vietnam. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated from societal and payer perspectives, while uncertainty analysis was performed to explore parameter uncertainties.

Results: Annual T2DM screening at either CHS or DHC was cost-effective in Vietnam, from both societal and payer perspectives. Annual screening at CHS was found as the best screening strategy in terms of value for money. From a societal perspective, annual screening at CHS from initial age of 40 years was associated with 0.40 QALYs gained while saving US$ 186.21. Meanwhile, one-off screening was not cost-effective when screening for people younger than 35 years old at both CHS and DHC.

Conclusions: T2DM screening should be included in the Vietnamese health benefits package, and annual screening at either CHS or DHC is recommended.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700026PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0261231PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screening
17
t2dm screening
16
screening chs
16
annual screening
12
diabetes mellitus
8
healthcare settings
8
societal payer
8
payer perspectives
8
chs dhc
8
chs
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!