Background: In the 2016 ISHLT listing criteria guidelines for heart transplantation, recipients were recommended to have a body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m². However, outcomes data for subgroups of transplant recipients with a BMI >35 kg/m² are limited. We examined the outcomes of heart transplant recipients who had a BMI of 35 to 39.9 kg/m² or ≥40 kg/m² and compared their outcomes with recipients who had a BMI <35 kg/m.
Methods: Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 23,009 adults who underwent cardiac transplantation between 2009 and 2018. Transplant recipients were stratified by BMI categories (<35 kg/m², 35-39.9 kg/m², and ≥40 kg/m²). Patient survival was depicted by Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional-hazards modeling was used to determine the prognostic factors associated with mortality within 90 days, 1 year, and 5 years after transplantation.
Results: Survival at 90 days, 1 year, and 5 years after transplantation was better in recipients who had a BMI <35 kg/m² than in those who had a BMI of 35 to 39.9 kg/m² (P values ranged from 0.01 to < 0.001) or ≥40 kg/m² (P < 0.001). Additionally, survival at 90 days (P < 0.001) and 1 year (P = 0.002) was significantly better in recipients who had a BMI of 35 to 39.9 kg/m² than in those who had a BMI ≥40 kg/m². In multivariate analysis, a BMI of 35 to 39.9 was significantly associated with increased 90-day mortality (HR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.12, 2.08; P = 0.01) but not increased 1-year (HR = 1.28; 95% CI 0.99, 1.66; P = 0.06) or 5-year mortality (HR = 1.11; 95% CI 0.91, 1.36; P = 0.29).
Conclusions: Although heart transplant recipients with class II obesity (BMI 35-39.9 kg/m²) may have suboptimal survival compared with those who have a BMI <35 kg/m², these patients have better outcomes than do those with class III obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m²). Thus, contrary to current guidelines, selected patients with class II obesity should be considered for transplantation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.11.005 | DOI Listing |
Trials
December 2024
Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Background: Intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) carries a significant risk of hemodynamic deterioration or death. Treatment should balance efficacy in reducing clot burden with the risk of complications, particularly bleeding. Previous studies on high-dose, short-term thrombolysis with alteplase (rtPA) showed a reduced risk of hemodynamic deterioration but no change in mortality and increased bleeding complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCardiovasc Revasc Med
December 2024
Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Okamoto 1370-1, Kamakura City, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan. Electronic address:
Background/purpose: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with ACURATE neo2 showed better hemodynamic outcomes by mitigating paravalvular leakage (PVL) compared with ACURATE neo, and revealed promising one-year outcomes in single-arm studies. However, studies comparing the hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of the two valves are still scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the one-year hemodynamic and clinical outcomes between the neo2 and neo.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
December 2024
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Santa Maria Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Bari, Italy. Electronic address:
Objectives: To investigate the impact of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) on 30-day mortality following cardiac surgery and develop a machine learning model to predict SIRS.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Single tertiary care hospital.
Open Heart
December 2024
Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom, Liverpool, UK
Pharmacol Res
December 2024
UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia. Electronic address:
Gut microbial dysbiosis or altered gut microbial consortium, in schizophrenia suggests a pathogenic role through the gut-brain axis, influencing neuroinflammatory and neurotransmitter pathways critical to psychotic, affective, and cognitive symptoms. Paradoxically, conventional psychotropic interventions may exacerbate this dysbiosis, with antipsychotics, particularly olanzapine, demonstrating profound effects on microbial architecture through disruption of bacterial phyla ratios, diminished taxonomic diversity, and attenuated short-chain fatty acid synthesis. To address these challenges, novel therapeutic strategies targeting the gut microbiome, encompassing probiotic supplementation, prebiotic compounds, faecal microbiota transplantation, and rationalised co-pharmacotherapy, show promise in attenuating antipsychotic-induced metabolic disruptions while enhancing therapeutic efficacy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!