The Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and the Nathan's Agar Well Diffusion (NAWD) tests are bacterial antimicrobial susceptibility predictors. Some suggest that the NAWD is not as reliable as the MIC test. We compared the MIC and NAWD tests as to how well they agree to bacterial sensitivity or resistance and predicted clinical outcome of burn wound infections. Using 65 bacterial isolates from burned patients, the MIC and NAWD tests agreed in 60.0% of the isolates (vs. a perfect agreement of 100%, p less than 0.001), implying that these tests are not interchangeable. From 18 burned patients treated with nitrofurazone or mafenide acetate, 28 infectious isolates were evaluated. The outcome of these infections was correctly predicted by NAWD in 92.8% and the MIC in 72.0% of the cases (p less than 0.05). It seems that for burns treated with topical antimicrobials, the NAWD is a more reliable predictor of bacterial susceptibility.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198702000-00014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nawd tests
12
burn wound
8
nawd reliable
8
mic nawd
8
burned patients
8
nawd
6
mic
5
control burn
4
wound sepsis
4
sepsis comparison
4

Similar Publications

This comparative cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the relationship between serum leptin and testosterone, FSH, LH, PRL and semen quality in fertile and idiopathic infertile Yemeni men. A total of 30 infertile males with unknown causes and 30 age-matched healthy fertile males were enrolled in this study. The body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) were measured.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

One hundred and seventy-seven bacterial isolates obtained from pediatric burn victims were tested for in vitro susceptibility against bacitracin, silver sulfadiazine, mafenide acetate, nitrofurazone, and mupirocin by two methods: standard microbroth dilution and Nathan's agar well diffusion (NAWD). Nitrofurazone had the broadest spectrum of activity. Mupirocin was the most potent agent against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bacterial antimicrobial susceptibility predictors such as the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay and Nathans Agar Well Diffusion (NAWD) assay provide essential information relevant to the therapeutic approach in burn-wound sepsis. The susceptibilities of 68 gram-positive burn-wound isolates were tested against topical Bactroban (mupirocin) (Beecham Laboratories, Bristol, Tenn.) and compared with other topical antimicrobials such as mafenide acetate, silver sulfadiazine, and bacitracin/neomycin/polymyxin (BNP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and the Nathan's Agar Well Diffusion (NAWD) tests are bacterial antimicrobial susceptibility predictors. Some suggest that the NAWD is not as reliable as the MIC test. We compared the MIC and NAWD tests as to how well they agree to bacterial sensitivity or resistance and predicted clinical outcome of burn wound infections.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!