Background: Although TURB of tumor (TURBT) by itself can eradicate a non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) completely, these tumors commonly recur and can progress to MIBC. It is, therefore, necessary to consider adjuvant therapy in most patients. The primary objective of the present study was to report our experience with EMDA/MMC and BCG, considering efficacy, progression, and recurrence, as adjuvant therapy in NMIBC patients; the secondary objective was to assess the efficacy of EMDA/MMC versus BCG as a comparative treatment.

Methods: Between April 2016 and February 2020, a series of 216 patients, with a diagnosis of intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC after TURBT, underwent adjuvant intravesical therapy. In 26 cases with a failure of the treatment, in patients unfit and unwilling for radical cystectomy, a repeated intravesical therapy was performed (2 had a twice repetition). Out of 244 adjuvant therapies, 140 EMDA/MMC and 104 BCG treatments were done. The following data were collected for each patient: baseline demographics and clinical data and perioperative and postoperative data. Overall patients' adjuvant intravesical therapies were included in a prospectively maintained institutional database, and a retrospective chart review was performed. We collected data on 2 main outcomes, recurrence-free survival (defined as a negative cystoscopy, cytology, and/or histology at the evaluation time point) and progression-free survival (defined as a negative cystoscopy or a nonprogressive tumor recurrence).

Results: The NMIBC progression rate was higher in BCG than EMDA/MMC but not statistically significant (respectively, 4.2% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.703). In the overall population, the risk of NMIBC recurrence was higher after BCG than EMDA/MMC (p = 0.025). In the subgroups of 59 paired patients with similar characteristics, no difference was observed between groups in NMIBC progression and recurrence.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that EMDA/MMC and BCG are safe and reproducible approaches as adjuvant treatment in NMIBC. EMDA/MMC permits to achieve a fine oncological management as adjuvant treatment in NMIBC, which is not less than that obtained with BCG.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000520630DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

emda/mmc
8
emda/mmc versus
8
bcg
8
bladder cancer
8
nmibc
8
adjuvant therapy
8
emda/mmc bcg
8
adjuvant intravesical
8
intravesical therapy
8
survival defined
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for high-risk non muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) failing first BCG treatment. A second BCG course is an option for those patients who refuse RC or are not eligible for it, but its success rate is quite low. Aim of the present study was to determine whether the addition of intravesical electromotive drug administration of mytomicin-C (EMDA-MMC) improved the efficacy of second BCG course.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Although TURB of tumor (TURBT) by itself can eradicate a non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) completely, these tumors commonly recur and can progress to MIBC. It is, therefore, necessary to consider adjuvant therapy in most patients. The primary objective of the present study was to report our experience with EMDA/MMC and BCG, considering efficacy, progression, and recurrence, as adjuvant therapy in NMIBC patients; the secondary objective was to assess the efficacy of EMDA/MMC versus BCG as a comparative treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of electro-mediated drug administration of mitomycin C (EMDA/MMC) after transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TURBT) in preventing non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurrence and progression and to explore clinical and demographic factors associated with treatment response.

Patients And Methods: Between April 2016 and August 2019, 112 patients diagnosed with intermediate- or high-risk NMIBC underwent a TURBT followed by an EMDA/MMC treatment. The percentage of treatment responders and progression-free survivors at 3 and 6 months were evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The treatment of choice for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). However, when this fails, the indicated treatment is radical cystectomy. In recent years, trials are being developed with various drugs to avoid this surgery in patients with BCG failure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sequential administration of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and Electromotive Drug Administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) for the treatment of high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer after BCG failure.

Urol Oncol

November 2020

Department of Surgical Oncology, Urology. University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, Urology, Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address:

Background: There is a need for effective nonsurgical treatment options in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in whom Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy has failed.

Objective: We aimed to determine the efficacy of Electromotive Drug Administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) with NMIBC after BCG failure.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A retrospective review of 26 NMIBC patients in whom BCG therapy failed who received BCG/EMDA-MMC between 2013 and 2017 was performed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!