AI Article Synopsis

  • This study investigates the real-world application of treatment intensification beyond androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in older men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) in Ontario, Canada.
  • A cohort of 3556 patients from 2014 to 2019 showed that 78.6% were treated with standard ADT, while only 11.2% received ADT plus docetaxel and 1.5% received ADT with abiraterone acetate, indicating low uptake of intensified treatment.
  • Despite evidence suggesting better outcomes with intensified therapy, most patients in the study still received only ADT, highlighting the need for improved understanding of barriers to treatment

Article Abstract

Background: Despite the wealth of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of treatment intensification beyond androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) among patients with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), little is known of its real-world use. This study examined the real-world uptake of ADT treatment intensification among older men in a large Canadian province.

Methods: We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study using province-wide linked administrative data in Ontario, Canada. Patients 66 years of age and older with de novo mCSPC were included and their treatment with conventional ADT-based regimens, ADT plus next-generation androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy, and ADT plus docetaxel were identified and stratified by time.

Results: From 2014 to 2019, 3556 patients were identified with de novo mCSPC. Most patients (n = 2794 [78.6%]) were treated with a conventional ADT regimen, whereas 399 (11.2%) patients received ADT intensification with docetaxel and 52 (1.5%) patients received abiraterone acetate plus prednisone. In a time-stratified analysis of ADT intensification before and after the pivotal AA+P trial (LATITUDE), AA+P uptake increased from 0.5% to 3.0%, whereas docetaxel use dropped from 12.0% to 10.0%. The median survival of the study population was 18 months (interquartile range = 10-31).

Conclusions: The majority of patients with de novo mCSPC are treated with ADT alone in the Canadian real-world setting, despite randomized clinical trial evidence of benefit with the use of ADT-intensified regimens. As ADT treatment intensification is substantially underused, better understanding of the barriers to treatment and targeted education to address them are needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8678925PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkab082DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treatment intensification
12
novo mcspc
12
adt
9
androgen-deprivation therapy
8
intensification older
8
novo metastatic
8
prostate cancer
8
therapy adt
8
patients novo
8
adt treatment
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!