A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Undergraduate nursing students' self-reported professional behaviour at the University of Namibia. | LitMetric

Undergraduate nursing students' self-reported professional behaviour at the University of Namibia.

Health SA

Department of General Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Science, University of Namibia, Rundu, Namibia.

Published: November 2021

Background: Development of professional behaviour in nursing students is an important part of a nurse's overall competence. Self-evaluation is one way of measuring professional behaviour amongst nursing students. However, studies on self-reported professional behaviour of nursing students are limited in Namibia.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate nursing students' self-reported professional behaviour at the University of Namibia.

Setting: The setting was a university campus offering a Bachelor of Nursing Science degree in Namibia.

Methods: A quantitative descriptive contextual design was used with 100 nursing students. Data were analysed descriptively using a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA tests of variance and statistical significance.

Results: High mean scores were found in the areas of utilising evidence-based solutions (4.78 ± 0.58), promoting clinical teaching (4.46 ± 0.94), willingness to implement quality improvement initiatives (4.34 ± 0.518), and protecting health, safety and patient's rights (4.28 ± 0.55). The lowest mean scores were recorded in projecting professional image (2.22 ± 1.27), rendering evidence-based care (4.08 ± 0.44). The study found statistical significance difference between self-reported professional competency ( = 0.01) and quality care improvements ( = 0.02).

Conclusion: In this study, nursing students' self-reported professional behaviour was rated high (mean scores > 4.0 out of 5). Despite this high rating, it cannot be concluded that the students were professionally competent. We recommend that professional behaviour be measured from both students' and nurse educators' or patients' perspectives.

Contribution: The findings from this study provide supplementary evidence on self-reported professional behaviour with implications on nursing education and practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661282PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v26i0.1703DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

professional behaviour
32
self-reported professional
24
nursing students
16
nursing students'
12
students' self-reported
12
behaviour nursing
12
professional
10
behaviour
8
behaviour university
8
nursing
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!