A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Telemedicine use for pediatric asthma care: a mixed methods study. | LitMetric

Objectives: To identify factors associated with telemedicine use for asthma care among children and young adults, and to describe the parent and patient experience of asthma care over telemedicine.

Methods: Our mixed methods study consisted of an electronic health record analysis and a qualitative focus group analysis. We analyzed records for all patients aged 2-24 seen at UC Davis Health between March 19, 2020 and September 30, 2020 for a primary diagnosis of asthma. We performed multivariable logistic regression to quantify the relationships between patient characteristics and telemedicine use. We also conducted focus groups with parents and patients who received asthma care during the study period and used qualitative content analysis to identify themes from the transcripts.

Results: 502 patients met the inclusion criteria. Telemedicine use was significantly lower among patients with a primary language other than English (OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.025-0.54,  = 0.006), school-aged children (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.77,  = 0.005), and patients who received asthma care from a primary care provider instead of a specialist (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34-0.91,  = 0.020). Six thematic categories emerged from focus groups: engaging with the patient, improving access to care, experience of visit, measurements, scheduling, and the future of telemedicine in asthma care.

Conclusions: Alternating telemedicine with in-person visits for asthma care may result in improved access to care and reduced burdens on patients and families. Providers and researchers should work to understand the specific reasons for low telemedicine use among non-English speaking patients so that these patients receive equitable access to care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2021.2019265DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

asthma care
24
access care
12
care
10
asthma
8
mixed methods
8
methods study
8
telemedicine asthma
8
patients
8
focus groups
8
patients received
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!