Criteria for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and partially responsive depression (PRD) as subtypes of major depressive disorder (MDD) are not unequivocally defined. In the present document we used a Delphi-method-based consensus approach to define TRD and PRD and to serve as operational criteria for future clinical studies, especially if conducted for regulatory purposes. We reviewed the literature and brought together a group of international experts (including clinicians, academics, researchers, employees of pharmaceutical companies, regulatory bodies representatives, and one person with lived experience) to evaluate the state-of-the-art and main controversies regarding the current classification. We then provided recommendations on how to design clinical trials, and on how to guide research in unmet needs and knowledge gaps. This report will feed into one of the main objectives of the EUropean Patient-cEntric clinicAl tRial pLatforms, Innovative Medicines Initiative (EU-PEARL, IMI) MDD project, to design a protocol for platform trials of new medications for TRD/PRD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9095475PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01381-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

delphi-method-based consensus
8
treatment-resistant depression
8
clinical trials
8
consensus guideline
4
guideline definition
4
definition treatment-resistant
4
clinical
4
depression clinical
4
trials criteria
4
criteria treatment-resistant
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!