Background: How diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) perform in relevant patient subgroups defined by sex, age, cancer, and previous venous thromboembolism (VTE) is unknown.
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficiency of the Wells and revised Geneva scores combined with fixed and adapted D-dimer thresholds, as well as the YEARS algorithm, for ruling out acute PE in these subgroups.
Data Sources: MEDLINE from 1 January 1995 until 1 January 2021.
Study Selection: 16 studies assessing at least 1 diagnostic strategy.
Data Extraction: Individual-patient data from 20 553 patients.
Data Synthesis: Safety was defined as the diagnostic failure rate (the predicted 3-month VTE incidence after exclusion of PE without imaging at baseline). Efficiency was defined as the proportion of individuals classified by the strategy as "PE considered excluded" without imaging tests. Across all strategies, efficiency was highest in patients younger than 40 years (47% to 68%) and lowest in patients aged 80 years or older (6.0% to 23%) or patients with cancer (9.6% to 26%). However, efficiency improved considerably in these subgroups when pretest probability-dependent D-dimer thresholds were applied. Predicted failure rates were highest for strategies with adapted D-dimer thresholds, with failure rates varying between 2% and 4% in the predefined patient subgroups.
Limitations: Between-study differences in scoring predictor items and D-dimer assays, as well as the presence of differential verification bias, in particular for classifying fatal events and subsegmental PE cases, all of which may have led to an overestimation of the predicted failure rates of adapted D-dimer thresholds.
Conclusion: Overall, all strategies showed acceptable safety, with pretest probability-dependent D-dimer thresholds having not only the highest efficiency but also the highest predicted failure rate. From an efficiency perspective, this individual-patient data meta-analysis supports application of adapted D-dimer thresholds.
Primary Funding Source: Dutch Research Council. (PROSPERO: CRD42018089366).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M21-2625 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Application of machine learning methods for predicting esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.
Eur Radiol
December 2024
Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Objective: To develop and compare machine learning models based on CT morphology features, serum biomarkers, and basic physical conditions to predict esophageal variceal bleeding.
Materials And Methods: Two hundred twenty-four cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding and non-bleeding were included in the retrospective study. Clinical and serum biomarkers were used in our study.
Age-Adjusted and Clinical Probability Adapted D-Dimer Cutoffs to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism: A Narrative Review of Clinical Trials.
J Clin Med
June 2024
Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism remains a challenge for clinicians as its differential diagnosis is wide. The use of sequential diagnostic strategies based on the assessment of clinical probability, D-dimer measurement, and computed tomography pulmonary angiography have been validated in large prospective outcome studies. D-dimer measurement at a standard cutoff of 500 μg/L has gained wide acceptance to rule out pulmonary embolism in around 20 to 30% of patients with a clinically suspected pulmonary embolism.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychophysiological Adaptations to Exercise Training in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review.
Biomed Res Int
May 2024
School of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Introduction: Many COVID-19 patients display adverse symptoms, such as reduced physical ability, poor quality of life, and impaired pulmonary function. Therefore, this systematic review is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of physical exercise on various psychophysiological indicators among COVID-19 patients who may be at any stage of their illness (i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFContemporary approaches to pulmonary embolism diagnosis: a clinical review.
Clin Exp Emerg Med
June 2024
Department of Emergency, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Article Synopsis
- Diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department can be tricky because it involves different steps and tests.
- Doctors check for symptoms like chest pain or shortness of breath and use specific rules to decide if a patient might have PE.
- If they think someone is likely to have PE, they do imaging tests, while lower-risk patients might just need a D-dimer blood test to help figure things out.
Renal function-adapted D-dimer cutoffs in combination with a clinical prediction rule to exclude pulmonary embolism in patients presenting to the emergency department.
Intern Emerg Med
August 2024
Department of Internal and Emergency Medicine, Buergerspital Solothurn, Solothurn, Switzerland.
D-dimer levels significantly increase with declining renal function and hence, renal function-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs to rule out pulmonary embolism were suggested. Aim of this study was to "post hoc" validate previously defined renal function-adjusted D-dimer levels to safely rule out pulmonary embolism in patients presenting to the emergency department. In this retrospective, observational analysis, all patients with low to intermediate pre-test probability receiving D-dimer measurement and computed tomography angiography (CTA) to rule out pulmonary embolism between January 2017 and December 2020 were included.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!