A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Combination Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Sorafenib Improves Outcomes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis. | LitMetric

Purpose: To compare the difference in outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein thrombosis (PVTT) between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) concurrent with sorafenib and IMRT alone.

Methods: A total of 82 patients with PVTT from 2014 to 2019 were included. Of these, 36 received IMRT concurrent with sorafenib treatment (group A), while 46 underwent IMRT alone (group B). The dose of IMRT was 40.0-62.5 Gy/2-2.5 Gy/4-6 w, and patients received orally administered sorafenib 400 mg twice a day in combination with IMRT. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and median distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were evaluated by using LIFETEST procedure of SAS.

Results: The median survival time was 11.0 months in group A versus 9.0 months in group B. The 1- and 2-year OS in group A were 44.9% and 3.8% versus 28.6% and 2.6% in group B (=0.036), respectively. The median PFS was 6.0 months in group A versus 3.0 months in group B. The 1- and 2-year PFS in group A were 20.7% and 6.9% versus 2.7% and 0.0% in group B (=0.012), respectively. The 1- and 2-year DMFS in group A were 38.0% and 7.9% versus 16.7% and 0.0% in group B (=0.019), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that Child-Pugh classification, AFP response, and overall response were independent risk factors for OS ( < 0.05). There were no significant differences in adverse events except fatigue and skin reactions between the two groups.

Conclusion: Compared with IMRT alone, IMRT concurrent with sorafenib can improve the long-term efficacy of HCC patients with PVTT, without increasing adverse reactions. The patients with Child-Pugh A, overall response, and AFP response obtained better OS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8664501PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9943683DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

months group
16
imrt concurrent
12
concurrent sorafenib
12
group
12
intensity-modulated radiotherapy
8
hepatocellular carcinoma
8
portal vein
8
imrt
8
patients pvtt
8
group versus
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!