In the spring 2020, measures introduced across Europe to limit the spread of COVID-19 included, among others, the temporary closure of borders. For Romanian and Slovakian live-in carers, this meant they were no longer able to commute between the Austrian households they work in and their respective countries of origin. Due to the relatively short cyclical rotas of 2-4 weeks, travel restrictions heavily affected cross-border live-in care between the three countries, which makes them a particular case for studying the effects of pandemic-related measures on transnational care arrangements. Drawing on media reports, relevant laws and policies, and interviews with representatives of care workers' interests, the article examines how live-in care as a whole and care workers in particular were affected by the pandemic and related policy responses such as specific travel arrangements and financial incentives for workers. It shows that while live-in carers were deemed critical workers and essential for the long-term care system, the inequalities and dependencies already existing in transnational care arrangements were deepened. Care workers' wants, needs and interests were subordinated to the interests of care recipients, agencies and sending and receiving countries.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655478 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14680181211008340 | DOI Listing |
PLoS One
January 2025
Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.
Globally, those who live in rural areas experience significant barriers to accessing health care due to a maldistribution of health care providers. Those who live in rural areas in the Appalachian region of the United States face one of the worst shortages of health care providers despite experiencing more complex health needs compared to Americans in more affluent, urban areas. Prior research has failed to identify effective solutions to narrow the provider maldistribution, despite it being a policy focus for decades.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
January 2025
Reproductive Epidemiology Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) does not receive any Medicare rebate. This study investigated the views of Australian healthcare providers and consumers on public funding of NIPT.
Materials And Methods: Two anonymous online, cross-sectional surveys were conducted from September 2022 to January 2023.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris)
January 2025
Faculte des Sciences Juridiques, Economiques et Sociales, Département d'Economie et de Gestion, Souissi, Rabat, Maroc.
Introduction: We live in the era of information technology (IT) innovations in the health sector, this has led to the appropriation of new organizational models which are profoundly changing the practice of medicine. Our study aims to determine the challenges of new digital technologies in the Moroccan health system, the case of the cardiology department - B - of the Ibn Sina University Hospital Center.
Materials And Methods: This is a single-center observational descriptive-analytical study carried out at the level of the cardiology department - B- for 6 months, from September 1, 2022.
Healthcare (Basel)
December 2024
Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 010041 Bucharest, Romania.
Background: Cardiovascular deserts are areas that lack medical facilities, specialists and equipment to effectively diagnose, treat and manage cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Romania registers the highest incidence and the highest mortality due to CVDs in Europe. Population ageing is a significant concern, as it increases the risk of CVDs and the demand for specialised care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Psychoactive Drugs
January 2025
Center for Critical Public Health, The Institute for Scientific Analysis, Alameda, CA, USA.
This mixed-methods study investigated the role of medicinal cannabis use among younger adults who live in rural communities and experience high levels of cumulative social disadvantage (CSD). Results are based on cross-sectional surveys and online interviews with 153 younger adults (18-35-years old) in rural California. We assessed participants' levels of CSD (high, medium, and low) and examined associations with perceived general physical and mental health and with medicinal use of cannabis (MUC).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!