Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To describe a case of robotic inferior vena cava (IVC) resection for an advanced case of renal cell carcinoma with accompanying robotic caval replacement using a synthetic graft.
Methods: In this report and accompanying video we describe a case of complete caval reconstruction with 3 year follow up. A 49-year-old male who at the age of 40 (9 years ago) had undergone right open partial nephrectomy for a pT1b 4.6 cm Fuhrman Grade 2 clear cell RCC with negative margins was found to have a recurrent mass at 6 years of follow up with suspicion of invasion into duodenum and IVC. For his recurrence, he underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic right radical nephrectomy and IVC resection followed by a placement of a 18 mm GORE-TEX graft anastomosed to the caudal and cephalad edges of the resected cava.
Results: The surgery was successfully completed using robotic assistance with a total operative time of 6 hours and 40 minutes and 900 cc blood loss. The patient experienced no intraoperative or perioperative complications and was discharged home on postoperative day #2. At 3 year of follow up there is no evidence of local recurrence. The radiology reports repeatedly commented on vascular structures "within normal limits." The patient had experienced no graft issues at a present follow up.
Conclusion: This case provides a description of the surgery with video demonstration of technique as well as provides a few technical suggestions that may be useful for those who attempt similar surgery in the future.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.11.027 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!