Background: Evidence is lacking regarding the efficacy of Optiflow transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE™) in obese patients. We compared the impact of this technique at 70 L min with 4 L min oxygen via nasal prongs on safe apnoea times of paralysed obese patients.
Methods: We randomised adults with a BMI >35 kg m undergoing elective bariatric surgery. While apnoeic and paralysed, Group T received 70 L min oxygen via Optiflow THRIVE™. Group N received nasal prong oxygen at 4 L min. The primary outcome was time to SpO ≤95% while apnoeic, with a 360 s cut-off. This was analysed by applying a time-to-event analysis.
Results: Forty-two patients were included. The median (inter-quartile range) BMI was 44.8 kg m (40.0-50.0) in Group T and 42.0 kg m (39.3-45.1) in Group N. Median (inter-quartile range) time to SpO ≤95% in Group T was 356 (165 to ≥360) s and in Group N, 210 (160-270) s. Using a survival analysis framework, median time-to-event in Group T was 356 s (95% confidence interval 165 s-upper limit not defined) and 210 s (95% confidence interval 160-242 s) (P=0.049) in Group N.
Conclusions: Compared with oxygen delivered via nasal prongs at 4 L min, oxygen delivery via Optiflow THRIVE™ at a flow rate of 70 L min can prolong safe apnoea time, however, the results are statistically inconclusive. Optiflow THRIVE™ did decrease the rate of reduction in Pa during apnoea.
Clinical Trial Registration: ANZCTR 12618000445279.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.048 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!