A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Clinical Significance of Peripheral Blood EBV-DNA Determination and Genotyping in Lymphoma Patients]. | LitMetric

[Clinical Significance of Peripheral Blood EBV-DNA Determination and Genotyping in Lymphoma Patients].

Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi

Department of Hematology, The Affliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China,E-mail:

Published: December 2021

Objective: To explore the clinical significance of Epstein-Barr virus(EBV) detection and classification in peripheral blood of lymphoma patients.

Methods: 101 lymphoma patients were enrolled, the clinical characteristics of the patients were collected, including ages, sex, types of lymphoma, Ann Arbor stages, extranodal infiltration and lactate dehyhrogenase. Fluorescent quantitative PCR technology was used to detect the EBV-DNA. Polymerase chain reaction and Agarose gel electrophoresis was used for determination of EB genotyping. The difference between curative effect in EBV-DNA+ and EBV-DNA- patients, the correlation of adverse factors and EBV infection of the patients were analyzed.

Results: 68.3% (69/101) of the patients showed EBV-DNA positive. EBV-positive lymphoma patients showed more adverse prognostic factors than the patients with EBV-negative, which may lead to poorer disease outcome. Among the 46 B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients, the overall response rate of EBV-positive patients (60.7%) was lower than EBV-negative patients(88.9%) (P<0.05); For 19 patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma, the overall response rate of EBV-positive patients (46.2%) was lower than EBV-negative patients (100%), the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Among 69 patients with EBV-infected lymphoma, 98.6% (68/69) showed type-2 EB virus, and 1.4% (1/69) were type-1 and type-2 mixed infections.

Conclusion: Most of EBV-positive in lymphoma patients were EBV type 2, patients with EBV-DNA+ shows poorer efficacy than EBV-DNA- patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2021.06.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lymphoma patients
12
patients
9
peripheral blood
8
determination genotyping
8
lymphoma
6
[clinical significance
4
significance peripheral
4
blood ebv-dna
4
ebv-dna determination
4
genotyping lymphoma
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!