Purpose: We have previously described anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a rounded rectangular femoral tunnel created using a rounded rectangular dilator designed to enable a more anatomical and wider tendon-bone junction. However, the influence of remnant tissue preservation on the creation of the rounded rectangular femoral tunnel is not clear. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of remnant tissue preservation on the creation of the rounded rectangular femoral tunnel.
Methods: A total of 198 patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a rounded rectangular femoral tunnel were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were categorized into a remnant preservation group (group P) and a non-preservation group (group N). Computed tomography images taken 1 week postoperatively were analyzed. The location of the rounded rectangular femoral tunnel evaluated using the quadrant method, its rotation angle, and the graft bending angle were compared between the two groups. The differences and the variance in femoral tunnel assessment were compared using the two-sample t-test and Levene's test.
Results: Although there was no significant difference in the location of femoral tunnel for the deep/shallow direction along the Blumensaat's line (difference, = .326; variances, = .970), the tunnel was significantly lower in group P than in group N, with no variances (difference, = .001; variances, = .326). There were no significant differences and no variances in the tunnel rotation angle and the graft bending angle (difference, = .727 and 0.514, respectively; variances, = .827 and .445, respectively). Blow out of the posterior wall of the medial aspect of the femoral lateral condyle was an intraoperative complication that occurred in one case in group N.
Conclusion: The remnant preservation approach creates a lower femoral tunnel compared to the non-preservation technique. However, a rounded rectangular femoral tunnel can be created safely and is reproducible with remnant tissue preservation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23094990211061249 | DOI Listing |
Arthroscopy
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China; Orthopaedics Clinical Medical Research Center of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China; Intelligent Orthopaedic Industry Technology Center of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China. Electronic address:
Purpose: To review patients with recurrent patellar dislocation surgically treated with robot-assisted medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction compared with patients who underwent surgery using the traditional freehand technique.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed to identify patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction from January 2020 to December 2023 in our hospital. The inclusion criteria were: patients aged from 15 to 50 years; patellar dislocation occurred two or more times; a Merchant view or computed tomography (CT) scan indicating patellofemoral joint malalignment, external patellar inclination, or lateral patellar dislocation; underwent MPFL reconstruction via robot-assisted or traditional freehand technique; complete medical records and imaging data before and after surgery; a minimum of 1 year of postoperative follow-up.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi
January 2025
Department of Sports Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming Yunnan, 650032, P. R. China.
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of modified single patellar tunnel medial patella femoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation.
Methods: Between January 2023 and June 2023, a total of 61 patients with recurrent patellar dislocation who underwent MPFL reconstruction with autologous semitendinosus were enrolled and divided into 2 groups using random number table method. In the patellar anchor group, 31 patients were treated with MPFL reconstruction with double medial patellar anchors, and 30 patients in the patellar tunnel group were treated with MPFL reconstruction with single patellar tunnel.
J Orthop Surg Res
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, R.O.C, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shih-Pai Road, Beitou District, 112, Taipei, Taiwan.
Background: Tunnel enlargement (TE) might jeopardize knee function and ligament stability after revision surgery of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. To date, only few studies concern TE following posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR). This study aims to determine TE after isolated PCLR and its relationship with patient-reported outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedicine (Baltimore)
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction aims to improve knee stability and range of motion. The AperFix system consists of polymer components, and fixed-loop fixation is an established endoscopic technique. Our aim in this study was to compare the long-term clinical and radiological results of AperFix and fixed-loop fixation and to prove that the long-term results of the AperFix fixation method are at least as good as those of the fixed loop device.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnlabelled: The increased rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears has led to a greater number of revisions. Revision surgery can be performed in one or two stages. Single-stage revision ACL reconstruction (ssRACLR) may be performed when prior tunnels can be re-used or bypassed whereas a two-stage procedure is indicated when bone grafting of dilated tunnels prior to revision is necessary.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!