A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Vision-Based Augmented Reality System for Middle Ear Surgery: Evaluation in Operating Room Environment. | LitMetric

Hypothesis: Augmented reality (AR) solely based on image features is achievable in operating room conditions and its precision is compatible with otological surgery.

Background: The objective of this work was to evaluate the performance of a vision-based AR system for middle ear surgery in the operating room conditions.

Methods: Nine adult patients undergoing ossicular procedures were included in this prospective study. AR was obtained by combining real-time video from the operating microscope with the virtual image obtained from the preoperative computed tomography (CT)-scan. Initial registration between the video and the virtual CT image was achieved using manual selection of six points on the tympanic sulcus. Patient-microscope movements during the procedure were tracked using image-feature matching algorithm. The microscope was randomly moved at an approximated speed of 5 mm/s in the three axes of space and rotation for 180 seconds. The accuracy of the system was assessed by calculating the distance between each fiducial point selected on the video image and its corresponding point on the scanner.

Results: AR could be obtained for at least 3 minutes in seven out of nine patients. The overlay fiducial and target registration errors were 0.38 ± 0.23 mm (n = 7) and 0.36 ± 0.15 mm (n = 5) respectively, with a drift error of 1.2 ± 0.5 μm/s. The system was stable throughout the procedure and achieved a refresh rate of 12 fps. Moderate bleeding and introduction of surgical instruments did not compromise the performance of the system.

Conclusion: The AR system yielded sub-millimetric accuracy and remained stable throughout the experimental study despite patient-microscope movements and field of view obtrusions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003441DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

operating room
12
augmented reality
8
system middle
8
middle ear
8
ear surgery
8
virtual image
8
patient-microscope movements
8
system
5
vision-based augmented
4
reality system
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!