Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Hypothesis: Augmented reality (AR) solely based on image features is achievable in operating room conditions and its precision is compatible with otological surgery.
Background: The objective of this work was to evaluate the performance of a vision-based AR system for middle ear surgery in the operating room conditions.
Methods: Nine adult patients undergoing ossicular procedures were included in this prospective study. AR was obtained by combining real-time video from the operating microscope with the virtual image obtained from the preoperative computed tomography (CT)-scan. Initial registration between the video and the virtual CT image was achieved using manual selection of six points on the tympanic sulcus. Patient-microscope movements during the procedure were tracked using image-feature matching algorithm. The microscope was randomly moved at an approximated speed of 5 mm/s in the three axes of space and rotation for 180 seconds. The accuracy of the system was assessed by calculating the distance between each fiducial point selected on the video image and its corresponding point on the scanner.
Results: AR could be obtained for at least 3 minutes in seven out of nine patients. The overlay fiducial and target registration errors were 0.38 ± 0.23 mm (n = 7) and 0.36 ± 0.15 mm (n = 5) respectively, with a drift error of 1.2 ± 0.5 μm/s. The system was stable throughout the procedure and achieved a refresh rate of 12 fps. Moderate bleeding and introduction of surgical instruments did not compromise the performance of the system.
Conclusion: The AR system yielded sub-millimetric accuracy and remained stable throughout the experimental study despite patient-microscope movements and field of view obtrusions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003441 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!