The impact of COVID-19 epidemic phase and changes in mean viral loads: implications for SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies.

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis

Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Pathology Queensland Central Laboratory, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address:

Published: March 2022

The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests is inherently linked to viral load. We explored whether average viral loads changed at a population level in Queensland, Australia during the early phase of the pandemic. RT-PCR threshold cycle (C) values, a crude marker for viral load, were compared for samples collected in February/March-2020 to those collected in April/May-2020, noting that the major public health interventions began in late-March 2020. Positive detections peaked mid-March, which coincided with the highest detection numbers and lowest C values. However, this changed from April where the later C samples (C > 30) predominated. Overall, in February/March 29% (267/922) of samples had C values >30 cycles compared to 88% (559/636) in April/May. Our study shows that SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in patients may vary at a population level over time. This needs considering when assessing suitability of diagnostic methods, particularly when methods in question are known to have reduced sensitivity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603442PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115598DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

viral loads
12
viral load
8
population level
8
viral
5
impact covid-19
4
covid-19 epidemic
4
epidemic phase
4
phase changes
4
changes viral
4
loads implications
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!