A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Association between level of training and reliability of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurement of angle of progression. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound (ITU) is used to check fetal head position before operative vaginal deliveries, but the effectiveness of this tool with less experienced operators needs further evaluation.
  • A study looked at AOP (angle of progression) measurements taken by OBGYN specialists compared to residents, revealing that while the average measurements were similar, residents had higher variability in their readings.
  • The findings suggest that specialist measurements are more precise, highlighting the need for improved training and assessment programs for residents in using ITU effectively.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound (ITU) is an accepted tool for assessing fetal head position and station prior to operative vaginal delivery attempt. However, the validity of intrapartum ultrasound in real-life obstetrics with operators at different proficiency level is yet to be established. We aimed to investigate the association between operator level of training and reliability of angle of progression (AOP) measurements in real-life obstetrics.

Methods: This was a retrospective study in one university medical center. We included women who underwent ITU for the measurement of AOP, before vacuum assisted delivery from November 2017 to September 2020. AOP measurements performed by residents and their correlation to head station were compared to those performed by specialists.

Results: A total of 320 cases met the inclusion criteria. In 234 of them, AOP measurements were performed by specialists and in 86 by residents. Average AOP for each station was similar between the specialists and the residents groups, indicating similar accuracy. However, measurements in the residents group were more scattered (median deviation 11.4° vs. 8.9°, respectively,  = .021), indicating poorer precision.

Conclusions: AOP measurements performed by obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) specialists are more precise than those performed by residents. Efforts should be taken to improve ITU training and to implement assessment of performance programs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.2014811DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aop measurements
16
measurements performed
12
level training
8
training reliability
8
intrapartum transperineal
8
transperineal ultrasound
8
angle progression
8
performed residents
8
specialists residents
8
aop
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!