This study was designed to evaluate the effects of cenobamate, an antiseizure medication for focal seizures, on the pharmacokinetics of cytochrome P450 probes (bupropion, CYP2B6; midazolam, CYP3A4/5; warfarin, CYP2C9; and omeprazole, CYP2C19) in healthy subjects. Probes were administered alone on days 1 (bupropion) and 7 (midazolam/warfarin/omeprazole), and with cenobamate 100 mg/day on day 69 (midazolam) and cenobamate 200 mg/day on days 99 (bupropion) and 105 (midazolam/warfarin/omeprazole). No significant interaction was concluded if 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration of CYP substrates and/or their metabolites were within the no-effect interval (0.80-1.25). When co-administered with cenobamate 100 mg/day, AUC from time of administration up to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC ) GMR (90% CIs) for midazolam was 0.734 (0.647-0.832). When co-administered with cenobamate 200 mg/day, AUC GMRs (90% CI) for midazolam, bupropion, S-warfarin, and omeprazole were 0.277 (0.238-0.323), 0.615 (0.522-0.724), 1.14 (1.10-1.18), and 2.07 (1.44-2.98), respectively. Co-administration of cenobamate with midazolam and bupropion probes led to values that were outside and below the no effect boundary, indicating that cenobamate induces the CYP3A4/5 and CYP2B6 enzymes. Co-administration of cenobamate led to omeprazole values which were outside and above the no-effect boundary, but with high variability, suggesting that cenobamate may moderately inhibit CYP2C19 activity. No effect on CYP2C9 was observed with the cenobamate and warfarin combination. Co-administration of cenobamate with these probes drugs was well-tolerated. In this study, 200 mg/day cenobamate moderately induced CYP3A4/5 (dose-dependently; 100 mg/day was a weak inducer), was a weak inducer of CYP2B6, moderately inhibited CYP2C19, and had a negligible effect on CYP2C9.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9010261 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13204 | DOI Listing |
Front Pharmacol
December 2024
Department of Epileptology and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Objective: Resistance to antiseizure medications (ASMs) is a major challenge in the treatment of patients with epilepsy. Despite numerous newly marketed ASMs, the proportion of drug-resistant people with epilepsy has not significantly decreased over the years. Therefore, novel and innovative seizure models for preclinical drug screening are highly desirable.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExpert Opin Drug Saf
December 2024
Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Introduction: The third-generation antiseizure medications used for the treatment of focal seizures, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine acetate, perampanel, brivaracetam, and cenobamate, may elicit serious adverse reactions which could be preventable if a prescriber is acquainted with the risk factors.
Areas Covered: The literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and EBSCO databases, without time and language restrictions. Only clinical studies, observational human studies, case reports, and case series that reported serious adverse drug reactions and risk factors were considered.
Epilepsy Res
December 2024
George Washington University, Department of Neurology, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address:
Introduction: Medication-resistant epilepsy (MRE) is characterized by the failure of adequate trials of two antiseizure medications (ASMs). Numerous studies have shown that once two ASMs fail to control seizures, the likelihood of subsequent ASM regimens providing seizure control diminishes significantly. Recent clinical data on cenobamate (CNB) suggest it may offer higher rates of seizure freedom in MRE patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTherapie
December 2024
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Université Côte d'Azur Medical Center, 06000 Nice, France. Electronic address:
J Med Econ
December 2025
Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the financial consequences of adopting cenobamate as a treatment alternative in epilepsy patients with drug-resistant focal onset seizures (FOS) from a societal perspective in the Netherlands.
Methods: A previous budget impact model with a 5-year time horizon was adapted to the Dutch setting accounting for the eligible population, real-world market shares, treatment effectiveness and resource use in two scenarios: cenobamate with constant market share versus cenobamate with linearly increased market share up to 20%. Clinical inputs included treatment response, seizure reduction and adverse events.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!