Inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flap versus profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap as an alternative option for free autologous breast reconstruction.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK; Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK; Department of Surgical Sciences, Plastic Surgery and Microsurgery Unit, Policlinico Duilio Casula, University of Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy. Electronic address:

Published: March 2022

Background: When patients are unsuitable for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction, the inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flap has been used as an alternative option. However, the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap is also gaining popularity as an alternative to the DIEP flap for several reasons. This retrospective cohort study compares baseline characteristics, peri- and post-operative outcomes following IGAP flap and PAP flap breast reconstructions after mastectomy for cancer.

Methods: In a single center in the UK, from September 2008 through December 2016, 43 women underwent IGAP Flap(s) breast reconstruction and 51 received PAP flap(s) breast reconstructions. Statistical analysis was performed to compare baseline, peri-operative and post-operative variables between the two reconstruction methods.

Results: Perioperative complications requiring reoperation were experienced in women undergoing IGAP flap breast reconstructions only (21% versus 0%, p = 0.001), principally due to the risk of total flap failure (12% versus 0%, p = 0.01). Women undergoing IGAP flap breast reconstructions were at significantly higher odds of revision surgery (OR 17 [95% CI: 5.5-53], p < 0.001), which was unchanged after adjusting for bilateral reconstructions (adjusted OR 18 [95% CI: 5.3-58], p < 0.001).

Conclusions: PAP flaps appear to be associated with significantly fewer complications and revision surgeries than IGAP flaps for breast reconstruction in women undergoing mastectomy for cancer and who are unsuitable for a DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

igap flap
20
artery perforator
16
flap breast
16
breast reconstructions
16
pap flap
12
breast reconstruction
12
flap
11
inferior gluteal
8
gluteal artery
8
perforator igap
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • - The study explores how leg dominance affects the choice of perforator flap donor sites for reconstruction surgeries using advanced imaging techniques to enhance preoperative planning.
  • - In a sample of 40 patients, most (87.5%) were right-leg dominant, showcasing that the dominant leg typically has larger and more numerous perforators for certain flap types compared to the nondominant leg.
  • - Results suggest that surgeons may benefit from prioritizing the dominant leg as a donor site, as it has better vascular characteristics and muscle thickness for improving surgical outcomes, although no significant differences were found in the subcutaneous tissue thickness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This case illustrates the surgical management of a perianal mass, initially misdiagnosed as condyloma acuminatum in a male patient in his late 50s, later identified as invasive squamous cell carcinoma following excision. Despite extensive preoperative evaluation, the lesion's malignancy was confirmed through histopathology. The significant, fungating mass required a multidisciplinary approach, culminating in a pT3 staging and additional wide excision with inferior gluteal artery perforator flap reconstruction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * Eight patients were treated using a combination of internal pudendal artery perforator (IPAP) flaps and inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flaps, with no functional limitations observed during a 6-month follow-up.
  • * The findings suggest that this method of using multiple perforator flaps is a viable option for repairing deep perineal defects following rectal cancer surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) is a relatively new surgical technique for low rectal cancers, enabling a more radical approach than conventional abdominoperineal excision (APE) with a potentially better oncological outcome. To date, no standard exists for reconstruction after extended or extralevator approaches of abdominoperineal (ELAPE) resection for lower gastrointestinal cancer or inflammatory tumors. In the recent literature, techniques with myocutaneous flaps, such as the VY gluteal flap, the pedicled gracilis flap, or the pedicled rectus abdominis flaps (VRAM) are primarily described.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Achieving a healed perineal wound following chemoradiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection (APR) is challenging for surgeons and patients. Prior studies have shown trunk-based flaps, including vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flaps, are superior to both primary closure and thigh-based flaps; however, there has been no direct comparison with gluteal fasciocutaneous flaps. This study evaluates postoperative complications after various methods of perineal flap closure of APR and pelvic exenteration defects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!